Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 October 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 14 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 16 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 15[edit]

06:02:08, 15 October 2015 review of submission by 212.174.9.118[edit]


212.174.9.118 (talk) 06:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alzahid Group

I tried to write an article about Azlahid Group which is one of the largest multinational holding company base in the oil rich town of KSA, Alkhobar . However my article was declined. As far as I see , there was not enough reliable independent information source which I had provided for my ariticle about the Alzahid Group. I am adding more information source about my article for Azlahid Group. Beside adding more information source, What should ı do in order to establish the page for Alzahid Group.

Thanks

http://www.arabianindustry.com/construction/news/2012/dec/17/five-big-industry-names-in-arab-rich-list-top-10-4136106/#.Vh89FYuhccC

http://www.constructionweekonline.com/article-20007-five-big-industry-names-in-arab-rich-list-top-10/

http://black-capital.com/news/category/arabs-families-companies/?lang=en

http://gulfbusiness.com/lists/top-100-powerful-arabs-2014/sheikh-issam-alzahid/#.Vh89iouhccA

http://www.yourmiddleeast.com/features/the-10-richest-in-the-middle-east_12655

It would help if you would explain the abbreviatons "GCC" and "KSA" used in the article, and state what country it operates in. And delete the final paragraph, which conveys no information at all. But the biggest problem is the complete lack of citations to support the statements made in the draft. Maproom (talk) 21:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KSA is probably Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and GCC is Gulf Cooperation Council, for what it's worth. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KSA mean Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and GCC is Gulf Cooperation Councill which basicly inculueds the countries in the Arabian peninsula. Because Alzahid Group is private family business in Saudia Arabia, they do not have to publish any official financial statement to the public but you will find source of information from Forbes Midles East , World Business Magazine and Arabian Business which is the most popular business magazine in Middle east about Alzahid family. All the information from this source shows Alzahid family is one of the leading private business group in Middle East.

http://www.worldfinance100.com/2014/ http://www.worldfinance100.com/2014/alzahid-group-of-companies-3/ http://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/en/lists/people/pname/alzahid-group/pid/84796/ http://www.arabianbusiness.com/the-world-richest-arabs-2014-574217.html?view=profile&itemid=574149#.VmWHR4uhfug

08:52:49, 15 October 2015 review of submission by Srijana.aaa[edit]


Srijana.aaa (talk) 08:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Srijana.aaa/sandbox is the profile of a non notable athlete as it stands at present. What is your question, please? Fiddle Faddle 13:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:53, 15 October 2015 review of submission by Rach.schmidt26[edit]



{{Lafc|username=Rach.schmidt26|ts=14:13:53, 15 October 2015|link=

I have tried to remove any "advertising" language or biased information. Many of the sources come directly from Mediomics website because they are describing the platform technologies and products. There are other sources from news articles that talk about the history of Mediomics, but I could not find any external sources that talk about the technology. Is it okay to cite Mediomics website for the technology information? Thank you!

I have left you a detailed comment in the draft itself. I hope you find it of some use. Fiddle Faddle 14:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:54:22, 15 October 2015 review of submission by Jmsieber[edit]


Hello, what does it mean, that user Oo7565 says that I "need help inlinein" my sources into my article and gives me the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inline_citation. Can you give me an example what I'm doing wrong? Thanks

Jmsieber (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmsieber: Because your draft is a biography of a living person, it needs to have in-line citations, where each claim in the text has a short numbered link directly after it saying precisely where the fact is verified. See referencing for beginners for some more information. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:39:31, 15 October 2015 review of submission by HastingsBella[edit]


17:11:58, 15 October 2015 review of submission by CJAYEBMASTERS[edit]


Please Keep this Article Clinton Jay Golthy-Masters Please DO NOT DELETE CLINTON JAY GOLTHY-MASTERS ARTICLE

<content redacted for BLP reasons> JohnCD (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article appears a completely promotional puff piece about a completely non-notable person, with only primary sources. Onel5969 TT me 18:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined with full rationale as a comment on the draft itself. Fiddle Faddle 19:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about one thing. We don't let people threaten us. Maproom (talk) 21:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:23:54, 15 October 2015 review of submission by SociologiesF[edit]


Draft: Jan Rath Submission declined on 30 September 2015 by Onel5969 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.


I was surprised by the rejection for two reason. First, the initial comments did not say anything about the point of view. Secondly, and more importantly, I was confused because the submission -- in my view -- does not include a biased view. On the contrary, in my view the text is written from a neutral, businesslike point of view So, it would be helpful of the reviewer would indicate as concrete as possible what exactly in the submission ought to be revised so as to get a more neutral text.

Thanks


SociologiesF (talk) 23:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a very full comment on the draft itself. Fiddle Faddle 16:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2015_October_15&oldid=1077821226"