Help desk
< April 16	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 18 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 17[edit]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/what do grasshoppers eat[edit]

♮©™♭♯♥♦®candy..............................................................hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah[↑↓↑↓↑↔♠♣]

Question: Do you have a question for the help desk, or is this just patent nonsense? A412 (Talk • C) 00:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

if i edit a submitted and declined article, how do i resubmit? is this done automatically once i make changes, because i performed the edit on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanielfirst (talk • contribs) 00:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To resubmit, simply add the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article, which will automatically add a new box for review. A412 (Talk • C) 00:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Homogenized Milk and Atherosclerosis Seeking constructive suggestions for approval[edit]

Dear Editors, With reference to the Article for Creation/Homogenized Milk and Atherosclerosis, after some one-half dozen rewrites, over the past three months, in which editor suggestions have been incorporated, the article has been rejected again. It's an important subject and any specific recommendations to get it accepted would be appreciated. Perhaps, the solution is to cut out 90% of the information out and just submit it in bullet-outline form? Respectfully Ambassador III (talk) 10:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Ambassador III Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Homogenized Milk and Atherosclerosis[reply]

Ambassador III

You have a very long article, the rules say it should be split, but some of the problem is that you have been doing a lot of extra work that the Wiki does for you. If you have a day or so, I can Wiki it up. That may help, then we can review the other issues. I don't think is is necessary to gut your article. If you are interested, contact me on my talk page, in the meantime I will move the article to main space so we or others can use its talk page. :- ) DCS 13:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There that only took a few minutes, your article is 24Kb shorter, and everything is still there. Your citations are very good, we just need to unessay it now. No worries we will have it slim and trim before the race. :- ) DCS 14:01, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is now here: Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Homogenized Milk and Atherosclerosis. We can discuss on the talk page now. :- ) DCS 14:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Paturi Sitaramanjaneyulu[edit]

Hi I created this article. it is under review. When can this become public ? Is there anything I could od to speed-up the process ? Sri pusuluri (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sri pusuluri (talk • contribs) 14:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed and declined (sources were unreliable: blog, etc.). Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 18:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

music[edit]

why is hooks and riffs important to music include the pitch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.96.109.165 (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what the Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 19:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Noel Ashman[edit]

I am working on an article about Noel Ashman- I submitted the article for review, it was salted and was thus deleted. I submitted it to the review board, I received a note that it had been unsalted, but when I tried to resubmit it I was told to wait until the final resolution from the deletion review board, but it has been over a month, I am not sure how long that takes, but when and how will I know? When that is done what is my next step to ensure that this article which meets all the requirements is not deleted outright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Broodwhich (talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright...tell you what I'll do. I'm going to accept it, and then immediately nominate it for deletion on procedural grounds and see where that takes us. It's a little out of process, but otherwise this will never get accepted at all. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 14:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]