Wikipedia:Username policy/RFC 2024

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non-ASCII usernames[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Should non-ASCII usernames, going forward, not be allowed on Wikipedia? By "not allowed", this would mean that users from now on who had non-ASCII characters in their username would be soft-blocked (not hard blocked). If they had a transliteration of the non-ASCII characters (e.g. in parentheses afterwards), this would not cause them to be soft blocked, but a lack of any ASCII text alongside the non-ASCII characters (e.g. the Unicode symbols with only numbers/symbols afterwards) would cause them to be soft blocked. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

  • Support. Felt the need to mark it here as RFC questions should be neutral. I believe that non-ASCII usernames make it hard to find a user's page/talk page for future reference. Not everyone knows how to find specific language characters to do so. I think this would increase the ability to find users without having to worry about non-ASCII characters. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This smacks of something that could be construed as racism (albeit that would be a stretch). Also, it would be hard to implement this because we can't just block experienced editors on other wikis for coming here. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LilianaUwU: I really don't understand. They can just write their name in ASCII anyway. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but someone who has a non-ASCII username won't change it for just one wiki. Also, unified login is a limitation. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Wikipedia:Unified login. Curbon7 (talk) 02:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - First, the second sentence doesn't follow from the first. ASCII is a subset of Unicode. But this is really just kind of a non-starter per Curbon7. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Per nom. As a Global renamer and an ACC admin, this has been to long coming. Communication is hindered by a username that includes a , just my opinion. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Is not already prohibited via WP:NOEMOJI? Curbon7 (talk) 02:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's just an example. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That does not answer the question. Curbon7 (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • What about non-Latin script usernames? NW1223<Howl at meMy hunts> 02:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not support this proposal. As a single login is supported across Wikimedia sites, and Wikipedia is a global community of editors, users should not be restricted to writing systems that can be written in ASCII. isaacl (talk) 03:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Multilingual contributors, for example, should be allowed to use their preferred/native language/birth name when editing enwiki. Frostly (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Why would we limit ourselves to a subset of Latin characters? To inconvenience non-anglos? This in no way improves the English Wikipedia, and makes most natural names bannable. 207.212.33.88 (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC
  • Oppose You'd end up banning half of Wikipedia with this policy. Especially those active on other projects where a non ASCII username is normal (jawiki, arwiki, or just any other wiki with a language that doesn't use the latin script). The current WP:UN is more than enough. Deauthorized. (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.