Wikipedia:Source assessment/Battle for Dream Island

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) is an animated web series on YouTube created by Cary and Michael Huang. For many years, it was a target of excessive attempts of article recreation and associated disruption, detailed in Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia?. It is also the only media series listed under Titleblacklist.

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
"BFDIA 6 Well Rested, MAP Reanimated [BACKUPS OPEN]". pkbnews.in. 2023-09-03. Retrieved 2023-12-04. Yes No Poorly written, suspected to be AI-generated based on Fandom content Yes No
Hinatsu, Satomi; Huang, Cary (2019). Battle for Dream Island: Official Character Guide. Scholastic. p. 48. Retrieved 5 December 2023. No Was written by the production team. Yes Yes No
"Battle for Dream Island (Web Animation)". TV Tropes. Retrieved 2023-12-04. Yes No TV Tropes is a wiki, anyone can add information to it, true or false. Yes No
Huang, Michael; Huang, Cary; Bryant, Kenzie (2010-01-01), Battle for Dream Island, Jacknjellify, retrieved 2023-12-04 Yes No IMDb is a wiki Yes No
"Battle for Dream Island". www.wikidata.org. Retrieved 2023-12-04. Yes No Wikidata is a wiki! Yes No
Troitino, Christina (2016-10-05). "The Real Business Behind Fantasy Food". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-12-06. Yes No Written by a Forbes contributor (WP:FORBESCON) No Mentioned in passing in the caption of an image. No
"Battle for Dream Island - An Animated Series Making Waves in India". Hindustan Times. 2024-04-16. Retrieved 2024-04-16. No The article disclaimer states, "This article is a paid publication". See also WP:NEWSORGINDIA. No Although Hindustan Times is one of the largest newspapers in India by circulation, the article disclaimer states, "This article [...] does not have journalistic/editorial involvement of Hindustan Times." Yes No
"Jacknjellify Celebrates Over 16 Years of Animation Excellence and Online Influence" pix11.com No "As the URL name suggests, that is a press release. It's not independent." – ObserveOwl No
The Harvey School. The Pulse. ~ "I think that the source can still be independent, since [Taylor Grodin] didn't work in BFDI at the time that the review was published." – ObserveOwl No "without a clear reputation for fact-checking and made by a student without qualifications for film/TV reporting or criticism (not reliable for facts or due for opinions)"
– ObserveOwl
No
The A.V. Club (1 2) Yes No Powered by IMDb, a self-published source No "doesn't have enough information to be significant coverage"
– ObserveOwl
No
WordPress sites (1 2) Yes No WordPress sites are usually self-published ~ Varies No
newsnownigeria.ng (1 2) Yes No No authors listed, poorly designed

"It just has a lot of characteristics of a content mill that just wants ad revenue without regards to accuracy. If it is a small news source, it probably isn't reputable enough."
– ObserveOwl

No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

See also[edit]