User talk:Zvandofarira2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zvandofarira2, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Zvandofarira2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Alright noted. Zvandofarira2 (talk) 06:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chamu Chiwanza moved to draftspace[edit]

Please read WP:GNG which is roughly how notability is ascertained in this collaborative project then have a look at 'reliable sources' which enables you identify and optimize reliable sources. Furthermore you many need to go through both WP:COI & WP:PAID & adhere if it applies. Lastly you may not use WP:PROMO wordings when writing a biographical article and must ensue your wording are as neutral as possible. You are advised to use the WP:AFC process, when trying to move the article back to mainspace.

Mudiwa Hood moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mudiwa Hood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Celestina007 for your contribution. However am not sure if you took more time to observe the level of sources put in article according to Zimbabwe. The person is notable and the sources are the key ones available in the country you can not get any better than those. The media coverage surrounding the Mudiwa Hood is very broad with independent sources including state media itself, he is a very notable person and I would like to ask you to observe a bit more about Zimbabwean media sources and you can see what I mean.

Thank you, kind regards Zvandofarira2 (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Celestina007, did you manage to go through my response and look into a bit of research from it? And also several improvements were made on the article to prove that Mudiwa Hood is a notable person. Zvandofarira2 (talk) 05:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zvandofarira2, I have reviewed your draft and pushed it back to you for further work. As you can see I have left you an extensive comment. You seem to have confused quantities of references for quality. Fiddle Faddle 14:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudiwa Hood (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
I'm having problems with this draft. I've looked at the first few references and found passing mentions, and interviews. I stopped at that point and am pushing it back to you for further work. First please read WP:NMUSIC and assess whether Mudiwa Hood meets the criteria. If they do please look at the remainder or this notice. If they do not please abandon the endeavour until they do. See WP:TOOSOON.

"and author[2].[3][4][5][6][7]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Once you have cut down on the WP:BOMBARD please consider resubmitting for further review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 14:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chaka Ngwenya moved to draftspace[edit]

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudiwa Hood (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LJF2019 was:
No improvement. Submit again without improvement and it will be rejected.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LJF2019 talk 10:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abel Mavura moved to draftspace[edit]

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaka Ngwenya (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
In addition to others, "Early background" and "Personal life" are completely unsourced. Please add reliable sources to any claim or remove that claim altogether.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pbrks (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C-Lash moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, C-Lash, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mudiwa Hood has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mudiwa Hood. Thanks! Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chamu Chiwanza has been accepted[edit]

Chamu Chiwanza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nathan2055talk - contribs 15:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudiwa Hood (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No chart, no Grammy, no gold record means no notability. The awards claimed aren't notable (so far as English-language Wikipedia is concerned) and I don't know how much faith I could put in Zimbabwe's Herald.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudiwa Hood (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
not clear how they would pass WP:NMUSICIAN?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C-Lash (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mudiwa Hood moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mudiwa Hood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It looks like Kuda.ndebvudzemene prematurely moved the article before it was finished with the AFC process. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chamu Chiwanza moved to draftspace[edit]

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaka Ngwenya (September 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

You have not added any sourcing to the Early Life section

" SARFM Radio in USA.[4][5][6][7]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

Please do not add pointless headings at the foot, it just makes work for others. I removed the one you added.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mudiwa Hood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mudiwa Hood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudiwa Hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 10:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:C-Lash[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:C-Lash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that Draft:C-Lash has become eligible for deletion again. You might need to request its restoration at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abel Mavura[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abel Mavura, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chamu Chiwanza[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chamu Chiwanza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chaka Ngwenya[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chaka Ngwenya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chamu Chiwanza[edit]

Hello, Zvandofarira2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chamu Chiwanza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chaka Ngwenya[edit]

Hello, Zvandofarira2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chaka Ngwenya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moira Knight[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moira Knight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moira Knight[edit]

Hello, Zvandofarira2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moira Knight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abel Mavura (June 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Hi there,

All of the news articles presented here are either press releases, appear to be paid for by the subject, or are puff pieces promoting the subject.

At this time, I believe it is WP:TOOSOON for Abel Mavura to qualify for their own Wikipedia article per WP:NAUTHOR.

Once the subject becomes a best selling author, or perhaps makes notable media coverage in France, he can be reconsidered.

Thank you for understanding!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

I hope, in the mean time, you will find some interest in editing Wikipedia articles about other authors.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to remove speedy tags, like you did at Mr Styllz, you might at least leave an edit note to explain why. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mr Styllz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major League. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Energy Mutodi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Energy Mutodi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Kupa moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Scott Kupa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayokunle Ayoko[edit]

Hello Zvandofarira2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayokunle Ayoko for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Ayokunle Ayoko to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abel Mavura[edit]

Hello, Zvandofarira2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abel Mavura".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott Kupa[edit]

Information icon Hello, Zvandofarira2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott Kupa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott Kupa[edit]

Hello, Zvandofarira2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Scott Kupa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zvandofarira2&oldid=1187227337"