User talk:Yoncehc

Welcome!

Hello, Yoncehc, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Yoncehc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Yoncehc

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Yoncehc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haden Christian Yonce (February 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

This article submission is a biography of a person which is aligned with the purpose of Wikipedia. Yoncehc (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Yoncehc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Haden Christian Yonce

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Haden Christian Yonce, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't agree with @Theroadislong that this draft is a 'hoax'. But I have nevertheless deleted it for being purely self-promotional and not appropriate to this encyclopaedia.

We don't base articles on our own LinkedIn profiles, as you have done,, but require citations to a number of independent and reliable sources with a degree of editorial control that have actually felt a person is sufficiently noteworthy to want to write about them in detail and in depth. See both WP:NBIO and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY for more details. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

The "hoax" material was possibly removed before you saw it? Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

No, I saw it. This is all just self-promotional stuff and I've nominated the image for deletion on Commons, too. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yonce's Theory of Everything

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Yonce's Theory of Everything, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

This is not a HOAX this is 33 years of knowledge + information and 3 years of design poured into this work. I've designed over 100+ digital products for fortune 500 companies and take offense to this claim.

Here are my credentials: https://www.linkedin.com/in/haden-yonce/ https://www.hadenyonce.design/

How could this ever be considered vandalism?!?!

The value of this model at the world’s disposal would provide life changing information which could very well lead to any and/or all of the potential outcomes listed below being born into reality:

1) Individual Value: - A better and happier life filled with Joy & success for any human who chooses to live by these universal truths as a force for good in the world.

2) Philosophical Enlightenment: I believe this holds many of the answers metaphysicists have been searching for throughout the past few thousand years.

3) Generational Value: A neural software program of philosophical principles to live life by could be taught to both existing and future generations of humanity.

4) Global Value: If adopted, taught, & applied by governments around the globe this could potentially lead to World Peace.

5) Ethical Machine Morality Governance: This could be leveraged by AI to ensure three things. The first is its purpose - which is the successful preservation of humanity. The second is a compass of guiding principles. The third is an information highway of connections in which all logic, rational, & reason can flow through. Yoncehc (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Somehow, you convinced me that it is not a hoax. But, instead it's an extremely blatant ad for your product. ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Please explain to me how a theory of everything is an ad or a product?

Where in this article am I selling anything or advertising?

Metaphysics isn't a product it is a branch of philosophy that deals with questions about the nature of reality, such as the nature of existence, causality, time, space, and the relationship between mind and matter. This work is exactly that. All I have provided is logic, reason, & universal truths which have been uncovered through years of hard work.

If I were trying to sell it why would I be giving this information away for free? These ideas very well could be worth a large sum of money - yet I am sharing them with the world out of the goodness of my heart to see change for the betterment of society.

To question this and accuse me of such a thing is illogical. Yoncehc (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

My mentor Saul Kripke is likely turning in his grave right now at such an accusation sir/ma'am. I urge you to really read through my work to first understand it before making assumptions and baseless claims. Yoncehc (talk) 03:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

It's indirectly promotional. Seeing as your theory has no news sources, scholarly info, or any sources related to it (the only two sources you linked to show your credentials are LinkedIn, which can't be used as an exclusive source due to Wikipedia:LINKEDIN, and your self-published source) ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

You want quotes to support my original work from other people sure I can do that.

“Culture - the way we express ourselves and understand each other - can bind us together as ONE world.” ~ Yo-Yo Ma

“Human behavior flows through three main sources: emotion, desire, and knowledge.” ~ Plato

"All you need is love." ~ Paul McCartney & John Lennon

"No fear. No envy. No meanness." ~ Bob Dylan

If you can disprove a single claim in the entire article - then I'll give in but we both know you can't because they are universal truths. Yoncehc (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

"Art Challenges Technology. Technology Inspires Art." ~John Lasseter

Proverbs 29:18 "When there is no clear prophetic vision, people quickly wander astray." Yoncehc (talk) 04:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

“We all stand on the shoulders of giants.”

~ Warren Buffett

"No one puts together a thousand piece jigsaw puzzle in a day."

~ Ed Mylett Yoncehc (talk) 04:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm not asking for quotes. I'm asking for RELIABLE sources covering your theory, which you still haven't gave me. I plead you to at least read the Wikipedia essay I linked which documents those ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

I haven't published it anywhere yet Flux55 - I just finished it on 01/24/24 and am trying to share it with the world but am getting denied because I haven't gone and shared it with the media?

I chose to first publish it on wikipedia because I decided to give it to the world as a gift vs. sell these ideas in a book to make a buck. Yoncehc (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Then at the very least, don't make an draft about your book if it hasn't even been published ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

When editors talk about sources that are being cited on Wikipedia, they might be referring to any one of these three concepts:

• The piece of work itself (the article, book) --> This article
• The creator of the work (the writer, journalist) --> Hello that is me
• The publisher of the work --> I was hoping this would be wikipedia but you all seem to love denying someone who wants to elevate your platform by allowing you all to share it with the world first

Yoncehc (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Can you disprove a single thing I've written as not being factually correct? Yoncehc (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

• avoid editing or creating --> This isn't about me it is about a valid theory of everything.
• propose changes --> If anything that has been written can be proved as factually incorrect then I am open to changes.
• disclose --> I have no conflict of interest in selling or advertising anything. I do not have a book. In fact I decided to use wikipedia because it is one of the only ways I could provide this valuable factual non-bias information to the public for free.
• avoid linking --> I don't link to anything. The beauty of metaphysics is that in metaphysics, a universal is what particular things have in common, namely characteristics or qualities. In other words, universals are repeatable or recurrent entities that can be instantiated or exemplified by many particular things. thus I do not need link to anything the logic of the relationships of these particulars creating universal truths stands on it's own.
• do your best --> I have done my very best to but am being bogged down with false claims and assumptions.

Yoncehc (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict-of-interest

Hello, Yoncehc. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yonce's Theory of Everything (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yonce's Theory of Everything and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothytyy (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Yoncehc,

I have removed the speedy deletion tag from your article but it will never be accepted into main space because it is all original research. Everything in Wikipedia articles must be verifiably notable as demonstrated through adequate reliable sourcing. Wikipedia doesn't publish original work, everything in articles must be cited by mainstream and academic sources like books and journal articles. Wikipedia is not for "cutting edge" ideas but concepts and theories that are supported by mainstream science and culture.

You will have more success by getting yourself your own personal blog or website where you can publish whatever you like and won't have to follow the many policies and guidelines that exist on this platform. I did read your article and it will never be approved because it doesn't reference other works in the areas that it touches upon. At the minimum, it needs some kind of literature review, it can't just be composed of your own ideas.

If you have questions about article creation or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Additionally, Wikipedia is not a platform that can be used to promote you, your career or your ideas and there is low tolerance among editors here for any self-promotion. You obviously think your ideas are somehow revolutionary but until they have received some coverage by reliable media or academic sources, neither they nor your life is considered notable as definted by Wikipedia standards. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yonce's Theory of Everything

A tag has been placed on Draft:Yonce's Theory of Everything requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Evidently being used as a web-hosting space for a theory made by the draft's author.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Panian513 17:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Can I please keep this in draft for six months to have published work supporting it? Thank you for your consideration.

With gratitude,

- H 96.228.37.198 (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)