User talk:Troutfarm27/Archive/Aug 2014 - Oct 2018
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thatwweguy 619, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Thatwweguy 619! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC) |
August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WWE Network has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: WWE Network was changed by Thatwweguy 619 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911155 on 2014-08-19T18:27:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
SummerSlam
Please see my discussion on the SummerSlam talk page about your edits to the page. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Hello, I'm 117Avenue. An edit that you recently made to Smosh seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 117Avenue (talk) 01:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonas Brothers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Asdklf; (talk) 02:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, I'm LM2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to WWE Network because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LM2000 (talk) 09:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WWE, you may be blocked from editing. LM2000 (talk) 02:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- I honestly don't care about the HD picture in the infobox, that's between you and RealDeal to work out. I do have a problem with you removing the picture and replacing it with STOP PUTTING THE HQ PICTURE in its place.LM2000 (talk) 04:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to WWE, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 03:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Your recent editing history at WWE shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.LM2000 (talk) 04:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. My revert was a procedural one as too many people have reverted you at this point and you have to discuss. You have to provide better reasons for removal than you have at the talk page, it seems like your argument amounts to WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Again, I don't really care about the picture one way or the other but others clearly do. Don't revert without discussing again as you may violate the WP:3RR.LM2000 (talk) 04:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WWE may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- under one year of its launch, making it the fastest-growing digital subscription service ever.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwe-network-one-million-subscribers-27047223</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, JetBlue, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Tenants
Hi there. Just a quick note that while Wrestlemania most definitely should be mentioned in a given stadium/arena article, it shouldn't be included in the tenant list since it does not fit the definition of a tenant. Many events are held in a given facility every year, including many as big as or bigger than Wrestlemania, such as the Super Bowl or an all-star game. A tenant is typically a team that uses the facility as their "home field" (or home court); they also typically have say over other events held in the facility, branding, and any physical changes made. Bowl games typically fall under tenant lists because many bowl games either have offices in their home stadium or are otherwise associated with the stadium (such as the Rose Bowl or Cotton Bowl). Other organizations can be listed as tenants if they also are physically headquartered at the stadium, such as the Houston Rodeo at NRG Stadium (which was designed to accommodate the rodeo). Wrestlemania moves every year just like the Super Bowl, so it's not headquarted at a specific "home" stadium/arena, similar to concerts and other traveling shows. Even conference championship games and conference tournaments in college sports aren't considered tenants since they aren't headquartered at the arena; they're a group that rents the facility once a year. If we list every notable event at a facility, the tenant list in many buildings would be excessively long.
Again, no issues with adding sourced info on Wrestlemania in the body of the article itself as it is a notable use. Any questions, feel free to ask! --JonRidinger (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Chris Benoit
Please stop trying to remove mentions of Chris Benoit from articles. This is an encyclopedia. We report what history is.--WillC 03:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to CM Punk— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SummerSlam (2013), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hell in a Cell (2015) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe talk 02:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hell in a Cell (2015) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)- I am deleting my above message because I have looked at this further and believe you have cited a possible legitimate source. However, can you not provide a more specific citation to the web page from which your edit is sourced? 411mania.com alone is a large web site. Even if someone could find the page today, I don't think it would be easy to back up this statement some months from now. The reader should not have to go to the web site and search for the quote but should be directed to the exact page. See: Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Footnotes and specific pages linked from those pages as necessary. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Extreme Rules 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Extreme Rules 2015, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IsraphelMac (talk) 02:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Troutfarm27/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was about to undo my edits, but I was blocked. Thatwweguy 619 (talk) 03:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sorry, your actions clearly constituted vandalism. If Materialscientist hadn't blocked you, I quite likely would have. I see no reason at this point why you should be unblocked early. Tabercil (talk) 03:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TLC: Tables, Ladders and Chairs (2014). Maximum capacity for the arena is 20,562. There is no way there was over 100,000 people at the show. Tabercil (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Professional Wrestling Barnstar | |
| Awarded by LM2000 for your work on Hell in a Cell (2015). You saw to improve it to Wikipedia Standards.LM2000 (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Thatwweguy 619. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at American Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also do not change logo size without giving any reason. David J Johnson (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Requests for page protection - Ronda Rousey
Hi WWEguy, in the future, if you need a page protected, you might consider dropping a request at WP:RFPP (Requests For Page Protection) just to get admins' eyes faster. I just happened by the Ronda Rousey article after hearing about her loss, noticed that she was labeled as retired, thought that might have been some squirrely editing, looked in the history and saw a bunch of vandalism, along with your plea that an admin protect the page. So it was kind of a circuitous coincidence that I noticed there was a problem. Anyway, just a thought. Take care, and I hope you didn't lose any money. 
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb: Thank you for the info. I'll drop a request next time. Also, Happy New Year! :) Thatwweguy 619 (talk) 06:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Likewise! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source
Hi Thatwweguy 619. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Super Bowl LII
Unless you have a properly licensed version of the logo for Super Bowl LII, please do not change the image being used. Elisfkc (talk) 04:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, CrispyCream27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
September 2018
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Daniel Carlson (American football), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kirbanzo (talk) 20:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Kirbanzo: Does this rule apply to the subject of the article? I was making that statement towards Daniel Carlson, not another user. CrispyCream27 (talk) 21:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- In that case, it applies as defamation. Warning still valid. Kirbanzo (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies. The ending of that game was just really frustrating. Will refrain from this in the future. CrispyCream27 (talk) 21:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Copley High School
I am an alum of Chs and was making accurate additions to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.105.113.223 (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
@143.105.113.223: I'm sorry, but there is no such thing as a Fortnite state championship and someone who is a concessions manager at your local Regal theater is not noteworthy enough to be listed under notable alumni. CrispyCream27 (talk) 02:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)