User talk:Toocostly

Welcome!

Hello, Toocostly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 05:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Please stop reverting the "Class Action Lawyers" page to your bias version. Wikipedia is meant to be an unbiased resource, and you're obviously just trying to slander a group. Useredit8741 (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Useredit8741[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Your addition to Professional objector has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution noticeboard thread[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Class action lawyers". Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 05:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Class action lawyers. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 05:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]