User talk:Thisisashan

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

--Orange Mike | Talk 04:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike: The Wikipedia policies are ignored in cases of favoritism and excused where they are not favorable. In fact, PRIOR to your blocking me, the 'threats' were already removed. Calling out harassment is not against Wikipedia's guidelines is it? No. It is not. You were used as a tool to silence an opposing viewpoint. It is disgusting and all people involved should feel ashamed, but they most obviously will not. Just like they don't feel ashamed about going against the guidelines of Wikipedia themselves, unlike me, doing so knowingly. Did you guys assume best intentions? No you did not. Is there a maintained neutral point of view when the antifemnist is bullied out of the antifeminist section due to little more than opinions which conflict with the feminist that polices the antifeminist section? No, there is not.

Meanwhile the same feminist that attempts to report me for misconduct resorts to making fun of my age in JAPANESE because she wishes to evade censors for her ageism. Leave it to a Genders Studies Major to think that one is clever, because no one in the world can translate. She is a bigoted, hypocritical, anti-intellectual failure of a human being. Study womens rights for a living just to resort to discrimination based upon age. Respect elders in academia? No. But thank you for supporting her and her libel, lies and slander. You have shown me what Wikipedia is here for, a joke.

Congrats on the policy of legal action not being beneficial for contribution, you just retained a Gender Studies Major who is willing to Lie, commit Libel knowingly, and commit to actual personal attacks (while accusing someone of a personal attack, wrongfully) and lost someone who was actually here to fix the issue with Wikipedia not properly representing Men's Rights. *slow clap*

Way to show the world that Wikipedia doesn't care about the rights of men. Way to show the world that Wikipedia wishes to trample on legal rights. Way to show the world that on Wikipedia, mob mentality is what is important. Facts? Wikipedia, "No thanks." Evidence? Wikipedia, "Hell no, that is synonymous with _primary source_." Mob mentality.

Frankly Orangemike, go ahead and upgrade my ban back to permanent like it was initially. When I am going university to university this Summer, I will make sure and bring up Wikipedia to make sure that everyone knows it is to stay out of academia, where facts and evidence belong, not mob mentality. Wikipedia will remain a joke for decades.Thisisashan (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't clear in this edit, I'm referring to Acroterion (who has been here longer than I and is an admin) who you called my "buddy". The 「先輩がだいすき！」 was a tongue-in-cheek anime trope reference. Japanese is a rather contextual language, with few direct referents so I can see the possible confusion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No one is stupid enough to buy that this was directed at someone else when the entirety of your response in English was directed at me. You are a fascist bigot, and a frankly creepy stalker. You have been warned several times to stop harassing me, and that statement was not directed at you. Are you too incompetent to realize that you are breaking the law? Probably. That fact doesn't excuse it.Thisisashan (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring all the ad hominem above, I will only point out that you did not withdraw the legal threat. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike:While I understand that wielding logic is outside of your scope, I do feel the need to point out that an ad hominem is point at a person. My comment not only has a low amount of insults, it hits on several topics which are not personal insults. This makes them insults and not ad hominems. You are welcome, let me know if you need to be corrected more.Thisisashan (talk) 00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike:Also, you are incorrect. My history shows clearly that prior to the ban the comments were edited and the threats of legal action retracted. However if the harassment keeps up, I will take this to criminal court, because a private companies personal policy doesn't do shit to subvert legal action, does it? No. It is not a legal waiver.Thisisashan (talk) 00:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked access to your talk page because you keep doing the same thing that got you blocked to begin with. If you realized that it'd be a waste of your money and the court's time to argue that you anonymously coming onto a privately owned site, not following its policies after being warned, and facing no off-site repercussions was somehow some sort of illegal harassment on our end, you can file an unblock request at WP:UTRS. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To anyone watching[edit]

The user has sent me some emails that (amid various juvenile threats of prison time that only reinforce my belief that the professor claim was a bluff) claimed to have registered another account. As if we don't have a policy on that and no one has ever thought of that. I think it's safe to conclude that this was nothing more than an MRM troll and that we should just WP:RBI any WP:DUCKs. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]