User talk:Theemurman

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk) 01:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Edward Parish (Chicago)[edit]

So the big question I have about the article is the origin of the text. It looks like you've copied and pasted it from another source, and that will likely lead to some copyright concerns. I would recommend reworking the whole article in your own words, as that should alleviate the concerns. (Please let me know when you do; there are ways to make old versions of the page invisible.)

I've also tweaked the categories some, and moved the article so there was a space after the period. Otherwise it looks good for a first start - a lot better than my own poor early efforts. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I should add two things. One, there's no "right" way to begin around here - I know a number of longstanding editors who don't have profiles at all, by choice. I don't recall that I did for a long time, for that matter. Two: nothing that you did was any sort of violation of etiquette at all. I certainly don't mind looking over other editors' work for them, and I know many others don't mind, either. It's part of being collaborative. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn’t decide what to do with the title. I’ve never seen it written with an ‘. I have no idea why and was always a thing at the school. It’s all good though. Thanks again I’ll leave you alone.

Great thanks.[edit]

Ill jump on that and find who wrote the original or do major rewording. Thanks for the help!!(Theemurman (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to St. Edward's Parish (Chicago), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. dmartin969 01:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Guidance for younger editors, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not vandalise talk pages dmartin969 01:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I gave my reason! Don’t just post because you think someone is being destructive. They deleted the article that had all the info box information on it. Info box got all its information from same article. And I don’t want wiki using the photos I took since it can’t use the article a priest wrote 50 years ago. And I don’t really care, only reason I’m reading this is because I thought you were the editor that ruined days of my work. SO YOU DIDNT READ AND CAME HERE NOSING AROUND. MIND YOUR BUISNESS

You are frustrated and therefore leaving[edit]

I noticed that a ton of helpful links was put on your Talk page on the 2nd of Feb, yet on the 4th of Feb you made a huge edit using copyrighted material. Why didn't you review those helpful links? Now you are mad and I'm not surprised. You shouldn't be, either. Wikipedia has a huge number of rules, some well-disseminated, some arcane. You failed to notice one of the biggies! Come back and try again, if you can tolerate rules on top of rules.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Theemurman! You created a thread called Brain-copyright- etiquette at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]