User talk:TJY1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TJY1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Kb03. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Euro Truck Simulator 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We don't speculate on the release date of things, if you can find a reliable source feel free to add it again. Kb03 (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sorry mate but im new can u add it back as it is a free country and that is a true fact TJY1 (talk) 22:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TJY1, the standard to include things on Wikipedia is WP:V. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. I'm leaving a welcome with links above. Please read through any relevant links as well as Help:Getting started for more information. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Euro Truck Simulator 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not start an edit war. Read WP:3RR Kb03 (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for disruptive editing. This is not a "punishment"; rather, please take this chance to review the links I posted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 22:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just point out that the panda and daily are actually in ets2 however they are unlicenced for copyright. do u 2 even play ets2 TJY1 (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TJY1 This is the last and only reply I will leave. It does not matter if we play the game, what matters is the sources you use to prove that what you are saying is, in fact, true. See WP:V and the links that L235 left. Good luck and happy editing. Kb03 (talk) 22:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also try fixing your grammar by capitalizing after a dot in each sentence so it would make it sense. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 13:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

U Lot Bots??

Hello[edit]

Hello, I see that you're back off of that 12hr block. Before you go and do anything that gets you re-blocked PLEASE read the links that L235 sent. I've also reverted your edits to L235's talk page because frankly, they're non-constructive and almost vandalous. Kb03 (talk) 13:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ahem what have i done now

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TJY1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im not vandalising AND im improving an article by adding key facts that weren't stated

Decline reason:

Though well intentioned, your edits are disruptive as they are unsourced. AS you've been told more than once. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Once you affirm you will do so, you can be unblocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.