User talk:Sweetabena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Sweetabena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Okpekpewuokpe Torgbuiga Dagadu IX".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sweetabena (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 154.160.18.75. Sweetabena (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline since, as your account is not directly blocked, there is no block to lift on it. As to the proxy block on your IP, it is a much better option for you to go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow those directions to request IP block exemption by email. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank youSweetabena (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It finally worked. Thank you Daniel Case for your suggestion. I was denied on my first attempt to send the email, but I have now been granted IP extension upon my second time sending the email with a proper explanation. I really appreciate. Sweetabena (talk) 08:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sweetabena (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 154.160.18.191. I would be grateful if you could assist me on how to get my IP out of a constant block. Any time a date is given for the release of my up, it automatically keeps saying that the IP address has been blocked again and then it extends to another longer period and I am wondering exactly what crime is. Sweetabena (talk) 09:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you were not granted an IPBE, there is nothing we can do for you. You last successfully edited on December 10th or thereabouts(depending on your time zone) so I would suggest recreating the conditions you were in that day to be able to edit- it could just be that you need to reset your modem to get an IP that is not blocked. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you follow the instructions provided by Daniel Case above? 331dot (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please I did and the response I got from the email I sent did not address nor provide solution to my situation.Sweetabena (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've been sorted now. Many thanks 331dot for your concern. I was denied on my first attempt to send the email, but I have now been granted IP extension upon my second time sending the email with a proper explanation.Sweetabena (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very good. Happy editing and best wishes to you. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Your enthusiasm is truly a breath of fresh air and very much appreciated. If there is ever any questions you have you are welcome to ask them again at the Teahouse or you may ask directly at my talk page. I wonder if you might want to participate in our Mentorship program, as a mentee, started by the WMF Growth team. Although 100% of new accounts are automatically enrolled it is voluntary for existing users. I am a mentor and a mentee myself. There is no pressure to participate as a mentee, I just thought you might read what it is about and consider it as another avenue of guidance for you. Regardless, happy editing and wishing you all the best. --ARoseWolf 14:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Faila Abdul Razak moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Faila Abdul Razak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Maliner for taking the time to review my article on Faila Abdul Razak. I appreciate your feedback and understand your concerns about the lack of citations from reliable sources.
I did research, but I acknowledge that they may not be the most reliable or independent. I'm open to finding stronger sources.
I apologize if I missed some key sources, but I understand the need for wider perspectives."
Sweetabena (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faila Abdul Razak (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 16:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sweetabena! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 16:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm okay with that Sweetabena (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Pope[edit]

Hello, I noticed you created the page for Junior Pope with his real name but it has already being created by someone else as Junior Pope. Articles cannot be two on Wikipedia. I suggest you propose a deletion to the one you created. Thank You. Enough citations on the other one. 2RDD (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]