User talk:SirShawn

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Ancient Egyptian race controversy[edit]

Please respond at the talk page - you've misunderstood the purpose of this article, which is not an article debating the race of Ancient Egyptians (you also seem to have confused cultural affinity and genetic affinity, which are not at all the same). Dougweller (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to pseudoscience. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to conduct yourself as you have at Ancient Egyptian race controversy, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

MastCell ^Talk 19:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that this means you really must get WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page before adding your material back in. If you continue to replace it while it is being discussed, I will take this further, either to WP:ANI or straight to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Note that I've already removed the 90% stuff. Dougweller (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SirShawn, your name is also mentioned at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Ancient Egyptian race controversy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fitzwilliam[edit]

I'm also bringing to your attention WP:RSN#Is a museum exhibition a source for a 'conclusive statement' by the museum?. Please take heed of this and don't try to reinsert it as a source for claims. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]