User talk:Shekhawatregion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shekha of Amarsar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shahpura, Jaipur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahpura Hotels for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahpura Hotels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahpura Hotels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Orange Mike | Talk 16:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shekhawatregion (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is no reason to block the profile, there is no valid reason and it is against wikipedia rules to block a profile, which is contributing to Wikipedia with proper references (Shekhawatregion (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

1) We don't have "profiles" here; this is an encyclopedia, not MySpace 2. You have admitted that this is a public relations account for a hotel company, and being used to market that company; and we don't permit advertising/marketing/shilling/pimping/PR/SEO. Orange Mike | Talk 16:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shekhawatregion (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and any Wikipedia user can contribute to it by giving proper information, facts with proper referencing. Purpose was not to Advertise or promote, it was to give the Right information and facts to users. Hope you Understand (Shekhawatregion (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

You admitted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahpura Hotels that this is the "official" account of Shahpura Hotels. Companies are not allowed to have official accounts here, and are not allowed to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. It also puts you in violation of paid editing rules. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Shahpura House for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahpura House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahpura House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahpura Haveli for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahpura Haveli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahpura Haveli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]