User talk:Sentryward

Welcome to the ATF[edit]

Welcome to the Anarchist Task Force. You're really an appreciated face here, since our numbers are currently in decline and an increase in participation is always welcome. If you need any advice or help on a subject, we're here to help. I'm one of the more active members, so if you need any help, either write up a request on the Task Force talk page, or reach out to me on my own. --Cast (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Cheers, my remit was really seeing if I could improve some of the UK based pages which is where most of my knowledge is, but I also note that libcom has a lot of bio's that need extracting. I will see what I can do. If you can point me any decent articles or videos on helping me turn a corner on editing, I would gratefully --Sentryward (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 08:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The help[edit]

Can you take a quick look at the Jane Patrick article? I am not sure how to amend or redirect. --Sentryward (talk) 00:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon, I've been away from editing for a short time and didn't see you had a problem. Changing an article title can be performed by selecting the "move" tab, between the "history" and "watch/unwatch" tab. When you select the tab, it will take you to a page and that will provide a short blurb describing what moving the article will require and entail. It's a very short process. Select what the new name should be (the default is always the current title, simply delete that and type the new one), then provide an explanation as a curtsey for other editors to understand your reasoning. If the rationale is obvious, a short explanation will suffice. If a move may ever be controversial (as in, there is an ongoing discussion about the matter on the talk page) be sure to give a good explanation, or first have a consensus to perform the move, and explain that the move in accordance with that consensus. --Cast (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sentryward, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Sentryward! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Freedom Press Books (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Peter Marshall and Brian Martin

Anarchy in Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mutual Aid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Nice work on the Crack Capitalism page!

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, John Rapp, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "John Rapp" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 19:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks! Obviously "violent" is not a correct adjective to this organization. Moreover, what do you think about this? Regards. --J aviP96 21:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Total noob on these matters, but inter-political squabbles suggest to me a need for lots of references. AFA was a small minority within left anti-racist struggles that had quite niche and developed views on matters that can't be easily explained away. A well developed piece could also escalate its quality scale to a wider audience. Your thoughts? --Sentryward (talk) 22:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, most part of the article have enough references, and it would be better to use the template {{Citation needed}} in some parts. --J aviP96 22:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Alfred Marsh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The slow burning fuse (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sentryward/The slow burning fuse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 21:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Sentryward/The slow burning fuse[edit]

Hello, Sentryward. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The slow burning fuse".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Sentryward/The slow burning fuse}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Freedom Press Books for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Freedom Press Books is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Freedom Press Books until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]