User talk:Rich1vanwinkle

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rich1vanwinkle! Thank you for your contributions. I'm CaptainEek and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. I am always willing to help folks out! You can also check out the friendly Teahouse to ask any questions you might have. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rich1vanwinkle (talk) 04:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the welcome! Happy to be on board. This article fills a void created when a prior one was removed. Admittedly, it was poorly put together but it was removed (I think) due to "lack of notoriety". After re-writing the "SERE" article, I decided to take on JD Garcia - an amazing man who I had the pleasure of working with in the 80s. Because he never sought notoriety, he didn't get his due, but I found dozens of citations and many on-line testimonials relating to his influence. I would like to think that Wikipedia (and its editors) value influence/contribution at least as much as "fame". I welcome comments/corrections/suggestions.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John David Garcia (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a hagiography of the person. Needs more external news sources. Also seems to be copied from some other biography articles, especially with dangling sources. Whole sections go into his outlines of his theories.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John David Garcia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John David Garcia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rich1vanwinkle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice[edit]

Hello, Rich1vanwinkle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rich1vanwinkle (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC) And hello to you AngusWOOF. I have no conflict of interest regarding this person or any content in this article. As indicated within the content (and the fact that I use my actual name in as my Wikipedia user name), I have nothing to hide. There is NOTHING for sale here - indeed, every book referenced (whether Garcia's or not) includes a link to a free download option. There is absolutely no "compensation" involved here - other than to correct the flaw in not offering this content.[reply]

That I once knew Garcia can hardly be a basis for a conflict of interest - unless such knowledge involves a bias that alters the factual basis for the article. If you find ANY factual flaw in this article, I will happily either find proper support for it or remove it. To the best of my knowledge, everything in the article is accurate.

My interest in writing and proposing this article is only that I agree with many others that Garcia's contributions and work have merit and significance. His work was secular, scientific, and significant. He, and his publishers, believed it far more important that his publications be known than a profit be made from them.

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Rich1vanwinkle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rejection of new article: John David Garcia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John David Garcia (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John David Garcia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John David Garcia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John David Garcia[edit]

Hello, Rich1vanwinkle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John David Garcia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for SERE article rewrite[edit]

RVW, this is a belated THANK YOU for the top-to-bottom rewrite. Looks like it's been further improved since, thanks to your solid foundation. Edward Barnard (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]