User talk:Rgojoey
June 2018[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sovereign citizen movement has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sovereign citizen movement was changed by Rgojoey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852464 on 2018-06-15T23:22:35+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sovereign citizen movement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Sovereign people has a new comment[edit]
MfD nomination of Draft:Sovereign people[edit]
Draft:Sovereign people, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sovereign people and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sovereign people during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Some friendly advice[edit]
Wikipedia does not penalize editors for the opinions or beliefs, even very odd ones, or ones that are widely rejected. BUT... we do require that everyone here understands that this is an online encyclopedia that is edited by millions of people and that in order to prevent chaos certain policies and guidelines have been adopted by the community. In order to edit here you have to abide by them. You cannot come here and edit in a non neutral manner (see WP:NPOV) or with an agenda. See WP:AGENDA. All claims of fact must be backed by reliable secondary sources. See WP:CITE and WP:RS. Right now virtually all of your editing has suggested that you have an agenda and furthering it is your primary reason for being here. If this does not change, you are likely to end up being blocked. Now if you want to argue that the article on Sovereign Citizens lacks balance or fails WP:NPOV, you can do that though I don't think you will succeed. You need to start on the article talk page and cite commentary from reliable secondary sources, not primary sources with your interpretation. When there is a content dispute the way it is resolved is through WP:CONSENSUS. CONSENSUS is the closest thing we have to an article of religious dogma here. We live and die by it. And those who can't, or won't, are shown the door. Your odd political views are not ipso facto fatal here. But if you can't divorce your conduct from them then your tenure is going to be very short. As someone whose political views are at least as strange as yours, I know of what I speak. If you need help drop me a line (see my talk page link next to my signature). -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I never said nor hinted that editors should be penalized, that I my edits are not neutral, have an agenda (as does the "Sovereign citizen movement" page). The data I provided is backed by the stated sources. I have said over and over that, as you said, "Sovereign citizens lacks balance or fails". Content disputes by majority vote do NOT change the information to a truth. Majority rules does not = reality. My political views are not the subject nor have I given any. The "other side" of the sovereign citizen is all I provided backed by actual current law. Nothing "odd" here except the emotional and exaggerated responses to my comments. Rgojoey (talk) 21:37, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Welcome Rgojoey!
I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Disruptive Editing[edit]
Warning Please desist in making political arguments on the user talk pages of multiple editors. Wikipedia is not a forum for such debates. Disregarding this guideline is considered a specie of disruptive editing. We have an article on the Sovereign Citizens movement. I have already provided you with links to the relevant guidelines and policies. However I must remind you, emphatically, that while you may discuss the article and make suggestions on how to improve it within the scope of our policies and guidelines, Wikipedia is not a political debating society. I am becoming concerned that you either do not understand our guidelines or are simply choosing to ignore them. Competency is required to edit the encyclopedia. If you are unable, or unwilling to abide by the community's standards you may lose your editing privileges. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at User talk:Orangemike, you may be blocked from editing. Reliable sources means reliable sources, not gibberish cut-and-pasted from some scamster or crackpot website. Almost none of those was an actual reference; and the ones that were, led to: cases that don't mean what the "sovereigns" claim they mean; big fat chunks of matter utterly irrelevant to the subject; and content blindingly contradictory to everything the sovereigns assert. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ian.thomson (talk) 03:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018[edit]
