User talk:Relativity/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Helloheart!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tacyarg (talk) 01:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop over-linking

Articles do not benefit from being a sea of blue, especially for common words that English speaking people will understand (horse, dog, United States...). Also, do not link the same word over and over again. One mosque is enough. And do not create a sea of red wikilinks for names of people for whom it is unlikely there will ever be an article written. David notMD (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Stubs

Thank you for your recent edit to Evarcha rotundibulbis, but please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article which already has a specific stub tag, and remember that all stub tags go at the foot of the article, not above the categories - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 05:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romanian leu

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Romanian leu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romanian leu

The article Romanian leu you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Romanian leu for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eviolite -- Eviolite (talk) 05:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Overtone (musical group)

As I pointed out already, I did a search for the band's name and members' names on Newspapers.com, Google Books, World Radio History (which archives music magazines such as Billboard), and I found nothing at all. Not a single hit. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igoeti has been accepted

Please do not delete this message. Thanks! 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 22:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Igoeti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

A message from 199.208.172.35

Hi! Thanks for helping out at the Teahouse. I noticed this edit of yours and thought I should point you to Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing others' comments. I doubt that particular IP will be showing back up to complain, but I wanted to head off any misunderstandings in the future. Please do keep correcting typos elsewhere on Wikipedia, they bug me too. 😉 199.208.172.35 (talk) 21:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Sewing Genie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sewing Genie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sewing Genie has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sewing Genie. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M90 motorway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terminus and Tarmac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

A message from Dinoz1

Hello! Is it possible if you can grade Harrowgate, County Durham for me please? Thanks! Dinoz1 (chat?) 16:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Alright, It has been graded! 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 17:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much! Dinoz1 (chat?) 17:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Helloheart! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikiproject, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of (viii)

Notice

The article (viii) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure how a single Roman Numeral is notable for a standalone article. This is a dictionary definition, which Wikipedia is not, supplemented with a piece of trivia from a predatory journal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Complex/Rational 22:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of (viii) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article (viii) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(viii) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Sumbawa does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. This is about this revert. By not using an edit summary, it might imply that you consider the IP edit vandalism. But as you can see, they have left an edit summary and acted in good faith. If you think that their edit is nevertheless unsubstantiated, you need to explain it in your edit summary. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 08:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Helloheart! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 10:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Helloheart! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Host, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Relativity. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Spectrum (physical sciences).
Message added 02:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Archives

Hello! You seem to have set up archiving, without linking to your archives from your user talk page. You can add {{Archives|root=User talk:Helloheart}} (or {{Archives|root=User talk:Helloheart|banner=yes}}) to the top of your user page to link to your archives. This makes easier to communicate with you. I see you've been welcomed to Wikipedia multiple times, as people were under the impression you hadn't been welcomed yet. Thanks, Femke (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Adopting request

Hi Helloheart ! I saw that you were willing to adopt in the Wikipedia program Adopt-A-User and I thought that you could "adopt me" ! I am interested in pretty much everything but I have a bit of trouble with code and expanding articles and I thought that you might be helpful. Anyway, if you think this could be interesting, contact me on my talk page ! Craffael.09 (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


Helloheart?

Hello. You wrote in your user page regarding your name, " Well, not in real life of course, but you know what I mean." Let me introduce you to Reality Winner. Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 03:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

A message from Bludisaster :)

Hi! I apologize for not responding to your offer of adoption sooner. If you're still available, I would still like to be adopted. Thank you! Bludisaster (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I am still available. Sure, I will adopt you! I'll change the template on your user page. Feel free to ask me any questions at any time!
𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 03:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Technology

Alright, I'm interested with your plans at pushing the article to B-Class. What should we do first? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! We probably should improve references and cite the sources. I've already cited the lead section but we will still need more references. Thanks for your interest! 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 00:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Vital GA Drive

The first ever Vital GA Drive by the WikiProject Vital Articles has begun. The drive aims to improve Coffee and Land to good article status within 45 days, from 1 September to 15 October 2022. The Vital GA Drive is WikiProject Vital Articles's first step at achieving its ambitious goal: all Vital articles achieving good article status by 2032.

You've received this message because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/30 kB drive. If your name only appear at the 30 kB drive page, you won't receive any more future messages from the WikiProject. If you don't want to receive such messages anymore, you can remove the template {{MMsgI|user=YOURUSERNAME}} at the project's member list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Question

I came to tell you about your signature, but stayed because I looked on your user page and saw that you've adopted a user. It's very kind of you to take up this responsibility, but unfortunately I may have some reservations about you doing so. It's a job that requires knowing all the essentials of Wikipedia, and there's a baseline of experience required that I just don't think is obtainable after 600 edits. Please let me know your thoughts. —VersaceSpace 🌃 11:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello @VersaceSpace, I think that I will maybe finish out with my adoptee and that will be it. Thanks! Helloheart (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your sig

Hi, I was going to request you make the pink a bit darker or use something other than white for the text, it's a cute signature but hard to read; then I noticed the talk link doesn't work because the cloud with three dots is included as part of the page name. That does need fixing. Yngvadottir (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

I came to say the same thing. —VersaceSpace 🌃 11:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello @Yngvadottir and @VersaceSpace! Thanks for telling me. How's this? Helloheart (talk) 22:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Way better —VersaceSpace 🌃 23:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Thumbs up icon Yngvadottir (talk) 02:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Helloheart. Thank you for creating List of s-block elements. User:ComplexRational, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I converted this page into a redirect because the subject is already covered at the target article. Having multiple articles dealing with the same subject is generally not advisable (see also Wikipedia's guideline on content forks); in this case, a "list of s-block elements" article would not encompass a different or broader scope than the target. You're more than welcome to expand the target article, though in the future, you may wish to be sure the topic you're writing about doesn't already have an article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Complex/Rational 02:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moustache Guard

Hello, Helloheart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moustache Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Playing footie

I understand (or think I understand) the main point you're trying to make at what's currently the foot of this discussion, but I'm confused by your olive hued example. Perhaps: Publication 1,[reference 1] Publication 2,[reference 2] and Publication 3[reference 3] say that, when compared with ???, Kuru shoes reduce pain caused by foot health conditions such as plantar fasciitis, bunions, and heel spurs. However, as long as the ??? isn't specified, this is meaningless. And I'd rather not guess what it might be. Anyway, you may wish to tweak your example a little. -- Hoary (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject User Rehab

Hi! There are a few questions I wanna ask regarding the Wikiproject . How many people are in the Wikiproject as of now ? And by the term "editors who have made serious mistakes", what do you mean ? If a hypothetical editor was being mentored, do they graduate or is the mentor always going to stick by their side? I am not really in joining but wanna help revive it. Not-so Wikiwow (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sewing Genie

Hello, Helloheart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sewing Genie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ComplexRational

Hi Helloheart, you can ask up to two questions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ComplexRational, one of which is question 8 ("Do you plan to be doing any work at Articles for Deletion, and if so, what?"), and the other of which could be one of the scenarios of question 9. Please choose one. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello @ToBeFree. Should I go ahead and remove the others myself, except for the one that I chose? Thanks, Helloheart (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Never mind, I'll just go ahead and do it. Helloheart (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply, and thank you very much. :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Oise amber at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK reviews

Hi, following my questions at Oise amber, I had a look at your QPQ review for Cathedral of Our Lady of Seven Sorrows, Suzhou. I am a relative novice at DYK reviews so I thought I would share some advice. I would suggest starting off with fairly straightforward nominations, ideally fairly short without images and without references in foreign languages (unless you understand them). If you start a review and it gets difficult, I would suggest leaving a comment rather than a review. Alternatively, you can ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Did you know as I have just done. TSventon (talk) 14:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello @TSventon, and thanks for the advice. Next time I do a QPQ for DYK, I'll do that. ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 19:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
m 168.121.86.150 (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Oise amber

On 9 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oise amber, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that even though Oise amber is found in France, it was produced by a type of tree now found in the Amazon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oise amber. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oise amber), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Question from Helloheart (20:34, 19 February 2023)

Testing --‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 20:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Question from Md Rejanul Islam on Intelligence agency (16:56, 27 February 2023)

Ami amr desher jonno nijeke bolidan dite chai, amr soto bela theke shopno but amr shopno ta purno holo na, amr ai desher jono kisu korte parsi na, maje maje onek koto hoy, issa thaka sortew desher seba korar sujog pelam na, --Md Rejanul Islam (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
  • Germany FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
  • United States TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
  • Byzantine Empire Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included Berkelland LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, New England Trainsandotherthings, England Lee Vilenski, Indonesia Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, Washington (state) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and Chicago PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from Dennis my brother 1 on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive84 (09:47, 7 March 2023)

Hello . How are you ? .. I sold a lot of tools to Google and wikipedia . I need my rewards for it --Dennis my brother 1 (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

@Dennis my brother 1 ok 168.121.86.175 (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello @Dennis my brother 1. I am fine, and do you have any questions pertaining to Wikipedia? If so, I will be happy to answer them. ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 18:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
my question is how do I get paid Dennis my brother 1 (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
@Dennis my brother 1, we aren't paid on Wikipedia, and we shouldn't be paid. (See WP:Paid Editing for info). Thanks, ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 19:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from Celestine-C-Enebechi (19:44, 13 March 2023)

Hello, does it have to be in coding programs like, Scratch. It is shared and it exists. It's called Scratch's got talent (SGT) --Celestine-C-Enebechi (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Celestine-C-Enebechi, and I do know how to program in Scratch fluently, but this is Wikipedia. If you have any questions about Scratch, please see Scratch and if that doesn't help I suggest going to scratch.mit.edu. Happy editing! ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 17:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from Celestine-C-Enebechi (19:12, 15 March 2023)

Hello, okay i've got 2 questions for you. 1. I have got a scratch account and I want to share the updates by writing an article. How do i do it? 2. How do I search for my profile on the searchbar. --Celestine-C-Enebechi (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from MinnesotaMethods (04:41, 16 March 2023)

Hello! How do you properly cite edits using references? I have had difficulty following the instructions. --MinnesotaMethods (talk) 04:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Question from Mahler ngcolosi (04:41, 2 April 2023)

I need novels --Mahler ngcolosi (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Question from Monarques on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (12:47, 3 April 2023)

Olá,como saber se vai chover hoje? --Monarques (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Question from Marry Jane Watson on Help:Introduction to policies and guidelines/1 (22:08, 3 April 2023)

Hi i am marry jane watson --Marry Jane Watson (talk) 22:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Question from Penomaniacc (08:21, 25 April 2023)

Hi. How do I appeal a block? It happened in the middle of editing an article :( I need help to complete a new page I just started working on. --Penomaniacc (talk) 08:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, Chicago PCN02WPS, and London AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Request for Adoption

Hi! I've been recommended to look into adoption. I'm relatively new, having mostly focused on minor copyediting for the month I've been here, though I'd like to move towards improving article quality more broadly. I figured that, as you have a background in grading article quality, you may be able to help me develop these skills. I will be fairly busy until 25th (of May), but after this I should have a fair bit of free time to commit to the adoption process. Let me know if you think adoption is right for me & if you think you'd be the right adoptee!

Kind regards, Designated Management (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Question from Jhonsmith19961 (09:08, 25 May 2023)

hi, i want to edit a bomber jacket article kindly suggest me a best article they can be edit easily as per wikipedia rules and regulation --Jhonsmith19961 (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Adoption Request

Hello Helloheart,

I saw that you were currently accepting adoptees. Is that still accurate? If so, how may I apply to be adopted by you? I look forward to learning more! Ike8omb (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Ike8omb. Unfortunately, I am currently at the stage where I cannot accept adoptees, at the very least not until I become un-busy (Is that a word?). However, I'll be glad to answer any questions you have about Wikipedia! ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 20:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Question from Dougallions101 (23:40, 23 May 2023)

what is setting up my profile page? --Dougallions101 (talk) 23:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

@Dougallions101 Your user page is a page of your own where you can describe yourself, your hobbies, etc. Just make sure not to strive too off-topic from Wikipedia. ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 20:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Question from Fgcom1 (13:23, 5 June 2023)

Can I use this for digitstem --Fgcom1 (talk) 13:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untrihexium

Information icon Hello, Helloheart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untrihexium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Untrihexium

Information icon Hello, Relativity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untrihexium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from Mary Neigel (16:28, 24 June 2023)

Hello! I didn't really want to edit, just ask a question regarding the 1940 (US) film 'The Letter'. Why is Cecil Kellaway listed as part of the cast when he's never seen on screen? Was his performance edited out and landed on the cutting room floor? I'm a fan of the guy - and Ms. Davis, of course! --Mary Neigel (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

@Mary Neigel, you said you didn't want to edit, but if you wanted, if you found a reliable source showing that Cecil Kellaway isn't really part of the cast, you could remove him and cite the source if needed, or include it in an edit summary. Or, if you don't want to edit, you could ask at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Film and see if anyone knows anything about the movie. I've never seen it, so I wouldn't be able to really make a judgement here, but happy editing! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untrihexium

Hello, Relativity. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untrihexium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 July newsletter

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Eric Matibu (21:16, 9 July 2023)

Hello --Eric Matibu (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

@Eric Matibu Hello ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Ravindra211986 on Questacon (18:30, 11 July 2023)

Hello, how may I assist ? --Ravindra211986 (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@Ravindra211986, Hello. I do not need assisting, but I can assist you in any way for Wikipedia. Cheers, ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 02:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thank you certainly I will ask you Ravindra211986 (talk) 03:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Are you still accepting adoptees?

Hi! I'm a relatively new user who is looking for an adapter, and it says here that you are available. Thank you so much in advance! Luna <3 (She/Her) (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi @LunaTheMoon2! Unfortunately, I am not currently accepting adoptees at the moment, mostly because I am busy in real life and I couldn't properly mentor anyone. However, if you have any questions about Wikipedia, I'll be happy to answer them if I'm available! Cheers! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 21:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
It's ok, I found someone else. Thanks! Luna <3 (She/Her) (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Hedgehog 1420 (05:18, 17 July 2023)

Hello! Do you know how to get to the periodic table in wikipedia? Thanks! Hedgehog 1420 --Hedgehog 1420 (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from I walk the earth (20:39, 18 July 2023)

So I finally got my User page created.

My goal is to create a page about myself and accurate representation of the history of my career in the industry.

With the user page set up what is the next step of setting up this page. --I walk the earth (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Ronald 209 on Ark II (17:10, 22 July 2023)

I have a saved image of the ArkII to add in the article. How do I submit images for editing the page --Ronald 209 (talk) 17:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

A message from 2601:249:F00:D420:20:5AA5:E9B7:312A

The first tenet of relativity is that the rules governing the way things move and interact are the same for two observers moving at constant velocity with respect to one another. 2601:249:F00:D420:20:5AA5:E9B7:312A (talk) 01:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Mr.Wonderfool (05:41, 29 July 2023)

hey! do you have any page to look me into.. --Mr.Wonderfool (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Munnasuresh (07:51, 2 September 2023)

Hello, May I hope to have your continued help and good wishes. Regards, Munnasuresh --Munnasuresh (talk) 07:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Gerald Shrimp (18:13, 6 September 2023)

I am in the UK. I have a deep interest in mental health as I personally suffer correction am gifted with bipolar. Yes I view it as a gift that many genius minds had. You have a brain for thinking which at present seperates us from machines.I fear the prospect of AI as they could develop to do what at present only the human brain can do IMAGINE. If you can imagine you can create. I like to think the great composers thought as I do without bounds.They did not simply write noes on paper. No before all that they imagined in their minds and sometimes were deemed unbalanced. Not at all just free thinking and imagination. Tell me if you think I'm wy in my thoughts. --Gerald Shrimp (talk) 18:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

@Gerald Shrimp I don't think you're wry in your thoughts, but this is Wikipedia, so if you have any questions about editing or using it, I'll be happy to answer them. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 00:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Dritani 1980 on Talk:Illyrians (12:48, 11 September 2023)

How I scream --Dritani 1980 (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

@Dritani 1980 I believe you say "aaaahhhhh" really, really, loudly. See screaming ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Uwulammajkjk on Domain-to-range ratio (11:55, 13 September 2023)

How can i find some typos --Uwulammajkjk (talk) 11:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Bray Editz (17:38, 13 September 2023)

whats editing --Bray Editz (talk) 17:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Knobby1234 (18:32, 13 September 2023)

You have Me as deceased. I did not die in oct 2023. I am alive. My cousin Bert H Bonanno passed away on this date Pleas correct my bio to reflect that I am still alive Dr --Knobby1234 (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Knobby1234 (18:42, 13 September 2023)

How do I correct the fact that you have me as deceased. I am not dead. I did not die in oct 2022. That is a different Bert H Bonanno. How do I correct this? --Knobby1234 (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Patrusho (23:18, 17 September 2023)

Hello! I'm in an "assisted living" home and would like to get out and know more about the world. --Patrusho (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

@Patrusho: Hey, looks like we have some things in common already: We want to know more about the world, and we have made more than 0 edits to Wikipedia :) Do you have any questions about editing? I'd love to talk more about adventuring beyond our closed environments, but apparently we're not supposed to get too off-topic here. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Sultan Salahuddin -chemist (06:28, 29 September 2023)

I want to publish my biography --Sultan Salahuddin -chemist (talk) 06:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

@Sultan Salahuddin -chemist I don't think that's the best idea... see WP:AUTOBIO. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Sultan Salahuddin -chemist (06:31, 29 September 2023)

How to publish my biography on Wikipedia? --Sultan Salahuddin -chemist (talk) 06:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

@Sultan Salahuddin -chemist I don't think that's the best idea... see WP:AUTOBIO. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

oof Celestine-C-Enebechi (talk) 14:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

@Celestine-C-Enebechi Do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 22:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Heyitseliza (12:40, 10 October 2023)

Dear ‪Relativity‬, I have revised the article for Bettina Lange I made and hope it now meets the requirements (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bettina_Lange). I am interested in making women in legal research more visible. Here is a similar accepted article by one of her male colleagues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Eidenm%C3%BCller. I would appreciate any help you can give me. --Heyitseliza (talk) 12:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

@Heyitseliza:, the first problem I see with your draft is that the citations are done a bit incorrectly. your first citation, for example, says "https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/author/bettina-lange/; https://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/person/bettina-lange; https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/people/bettina-lange". This should actually be made into three separate citations, one per link. I'm also taking a look at the notability criteria for people in academics, where if any one of these is true, then she warrants her own article:
The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
  • I would say, not really.
The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
  • She's won awards, but none of them are really prestigious.
The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).
  • No...
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
  • Not really. That collaboration that you mentioned is something to consider, but it didn't make a really significant impact on higher education.
The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
  • She doesn't seem to hold any other higher position other than being a professor.
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
  • She doesn't seem to hold any other higher position other than being a professor.
The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
  • Not really.
The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
  • No...
Overall, I would say that maybe Dr. Lange is probably not notable enough for her own article, although I was just going off of what you wrote in the article, and there could be other reliable sources that show otherwise. Writing an article is the trickiest thing to do on Wikipedia, so you should start small and make edits to already preexisting articles first.
Also, after you learn a little about editing you might be interested in WP:WikiProject Women and/or WP:WikiProject Women scientists
Happy editing! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Ciscolicense (07:32, 15 October 2023)

Hello and respect I have a company that has a lot of traffic and a lot of credibility on Google Many articles and reports have been published on different sites than mine I want to register a dedicated page for my company what should I do? --Ciscolicense (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

@Ciscolicense, if your company is truly notable then someone else is better suited to making the page because you would have a WP:COI. Therefore, I advise you to read both of the things I linked in this response, and you probably should not create the page. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Vbbanaz05 (09:11, 21 October 2023)

Hello, Sir! --Vbbanaz05 (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

@Vbbanaz05, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am not a "sir," but I'll be happy to answer any questions you have about editing. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 01:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from MugiwaraAhad (05:22, 23 October 2023)

Hello, can you help me to correct the false data of many articles in the surface web? --MugiwaraAhad (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

@MugiwaraAhad: If you find any incorrect information in a Wikipedia article, you can find reliable sources and change the information to the correct information. Cheers! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 01:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Muhammadbaloch991 (18:04, 24 October 2023)

instagram --Muhammadbaloch991 (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

@Muhammadbaloch991: Yup. Now, do you have any questions about editing Wikipedia? ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from Ministry editor (15:27, 27 October 2023)

Can I create my own article --Ministry editor (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

I have posted a message about this at User talk:Ministry editor. JBW (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from PAADC (09:04, 27 October 2023)

Hi, I want to create an article for an innovation competition. What key points do you think need to be in the article? --PAADC (talk) 09:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

@PAADC: You have to make sure that the innovation competition that you're writing about is truly notable by finding reliable sources about it. Then once you do that, you can create a draft about it. Also, I'd read WP:Your first article. Cheers! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, Delaware BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

  • Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
  • Berkelland LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
  • MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
  • Ukraine Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Rd1204 (00:17, 6 November 2023)

Hello Relativity, One of my favorite theories. My main experience is in Finance so as I come across articles related to Private Equity and Project Finance I may edit or add to those articles if needed. --Rd1204 (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@Rd1204: Alright, just make sure you're adding reliable sources, following the five pillars, and have fun. You can contact me on this page if you have any questions. I'll send a list of helpful links to your talk page. Cheers! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 02:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Zapster13 (10:33, 9 November 2023)

Hi my edit for Executive dysfunction has disappeared without myself being notified about it. May I ask why it is not visible? --Zapster13 (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Vuyiseka Mduzana on Wikipedia:Username policy (21:00, 9 November 2023)

How --Vuyiseka Mduzana (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Esenemagic (22:42, 9 November 2023)

i need to create a wikepedia page for someone --Esenemagic (talk) 22:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Smile4Christine (15:13, 10 November 2023)

How do I properly hyperlink an article to an edit? --Smile4Christine (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from IKunjalo Projects Enterprise (02:06, 16 November 2023)

Hello 👋 How do I write and edit on my page, it won't allow me to do anything 😔 Please assist Thank you --IKunjalo Projects Enterprise (talk) 02:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Spacetechchik (18:54, 12 December 2023)

I've created one article. I've made 10 edits. Is my post approved? --Spacetechchik (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from ZAEBMDR on Norma-Jean Wofford (18:06, 19 December 2023)

Please explain relaxation to me --ZAEBMDR (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

@ZAEBMDR: Perhaps the page on relaxation will help. Do you have any questions about editing or using Wikipedia? Cheers~ ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 20:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
good the kitesurfing Kitesurfing to mombasa Kenya (talk) 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@Kitesurfing to mombasa Kenya: Do you have any relevant questions about the notice I placed on your talk page? ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Banksfan47 (03:38, 20 December 2023)

How do I create a page? --Banksfan47 (talk) 03:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

@Banksfan47: See Wikipedia:Your first article. Let me know if you have any further questions ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Yes Kitesurfing to mombasa Kenya (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@Kitesurfing to mombasa Kenya: What is your question then? ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 23:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from 2077PP (00:13, 20 December 2023)

Hello! I actually would like to creat a Wikipedia page for my work. Not sure what do to next… --2077PP (talk) 00:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

@2077PP: Please read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Creating an article about yourself or a company you work for would mean that you have a conflict of interest, and therefore is strongly discouraged. If you have any further questions about using or editing Wikipedia, you can ping me here. Cheers ~ ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thank you for your reply. The thing is my name is mentioned in several articles on wikipedia (but not clickable) so in that sense it would be logically for it to be listed as a page. It would also be more about past projects and not to support any current company, therefore would not be any form of advertising. it would just complete all these existing articles that partly use incorrect countries mentioned etc. etc. 2077PP (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@2077PP: If you are truly notable, then someone who is not you will likely create your article someday. An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, and there are big problems when editors who have a conflict of interest create an article about the things that they have a conflict of interest in. I would strongly recommend reading everything I linked in blue here. Let me know if you have any further questions. Cheers ~ ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
I understand, thank you for taking the time replying! 2077PP (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
@2077PP: Thank you for taking the time to ask the questions. Many editors will just rush in and create articles for things they have a conflict of interest in and end up messing up in that regard. :) ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Can I ask you, are you a Wikipedia voluntary editor/writer? I don’t actually fully understand how the whole system of Wikipedia works… Or are you actually working “in house” at Wikipedia? 2077PP (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
@2077PP: Yes, I'm completely a volunteer here, just doing this as a hobby. I'm not paid to do this. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 19:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
that's so great, makes me appreciate the time you take explaining this to me even more ;) Could I bother you with one more question... Would you consider checking out my projects to see if you think my profile would meet Wikipedia's notability criteria? 2077PP (talk) 19:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
@2077PP: Which projects? I'm not seeing any new pages or anything that mentions your projects in your contributions. I will add, though, another point which I brought up earlier in which I said that if your project is truly notable, sometime or later someone will create a Wikipedia article on it. ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 21:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Musicmother (02:14, 22 December 2023)

hi! it's nice to meet you. i'm happy to have a mentor. i don't want to impose too much on your time, but if you have any advice on translating articles from another language, i'd like to translate an interesting page from german to english and expand upon it. --Musicmother (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

@Musicmother: Hello, it's nice to meet you too. I'm glad that you're my mentee. You should read Help:Translation and Wikipedia:Translate. Happy translating ~ ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 04:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Jamrach on January 6 United States Capitol attack (07:22, 22 December 2023)

You need to edit the cPtion for pic to (before the breech the police fired tear gas into the crowd --Jamrach (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Acadwiz1 (13:05, 26 December 2023)

I am not understanding why my recent edit was revised into the previous version, even when I have given more citations and showing what the person (Whose page I am editing) has delivered me the info to put up on it? --Acadwiz1 (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

@Acadwiz1: Your edits to Mala Rao have been reverted because you have a conflict of interest with her. Since you are employed by Rao, making any further edits to the article is strongly discouraged. Please read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. We'd like to have you as a constructive contributor here, but you should stay away from that article, or make edit request(s) on the article's talk page. Cheers ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 20:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Mashedpotatoesinmyhair (01:09, 30 December 2023)

Hello;

I've been trying to improve the article on Lini Evans; i am at an impasse on Ms. Evans Language abilities. For me, the claim to be able to sing in more languages then she speaks comes across as more promotional than informational.

I've been looking for more sources for these claims and came across 2 that stuck out to me, the article from the Vancouver Sun (Tuesday April 20, 1999) Multiligual Evans to Sing for Zhu " ( from linievans.com/reviews) It describes how she learns songs by listening to them over and over until she gets the words and inflections right then on her linkedin she talks about how she learned a few phrases and 3 songs in Vietnamese for a client.

Where i am having an issue is, for example, I can sing 99 Luftballons but i wouldn't say i was able to sing German, just that i can sing a German song.

At what point do you go from learning/ memorizing a song in another language to being able to sing in another language? Is there a better way to indicate that she learned songs by memorizing in the languages rather then just say she can sing in those languages? --Mashedpotatoesinmyhair (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mashedpotatoesinmyhair: This question might be better suited to the WP:Reference desk. Cheers ‍ Relativity 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from TheGoodFairy on User talk:HouseBlaster (17:42, 31 December 2023)

Hi! I notice I need to add a reference for the entry I made regarding Caissa (the mythical goddess) and the children’s book that continues her story. It is a currently published book. What do I need to do? There is also some issue with the tone the entry is written in. Can you help me fix these things? Thank you so much. --TheGoodFairy (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Artworkflow (07:09, 3 January 2024)

Hi, how do I add information/content to the Artwork Flow page? --Artworkflow (talk) 07:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

OP blocked for spam. ‍ Relativity 00:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Colingonefishing on Help:Introduction (07:10, 3 January 2024)

How do I cancel /close my account --Colingonefishing (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

@Colingonefishing: You can't "delete" an account per se, but you can rename your account, request a courtesy vanishing, or do a clean start. Cheers ‍ Relativity 00:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from SMUDGE RECORDS (03:04, 7 January 2024)

Greetings. I've created an entire page and published it. What's the next step to get it to show up as an internet search and site/link? I've searched for it to no avail. What am I missing? --SMUDGE RECORDS (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

@SMUDGE RECORDS: The reason that it's not indexed by search engines is because it's not actually published yet. You should submit it by using the WP:ARTICLEWIZARD. Cheers ‍ Relativity 03:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Is there a way to copy it onto the articlewizard? SMUDGE RECORDS (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes. You should click the "edit" button on your sandbox, change it to "edit source", and make a draft using the wizard and copy the source code there. ‍ Relativity 03:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Suggestbot

‍ Relativity  03:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Georgia in the American Revolution (talk) Add sources
85 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Raid on Richmond (talk) Add sources
223 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C John Burgoyne (talk) Add sources
239 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (talk) Add sources
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B South Carolina in the American Revolution (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C John Jameson (colonel) (talk) Add sources
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pascal's pyramid (talk) Cleanup
16 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Ann Bates (talk) Cleanup
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Câmara de Lobos (talk) Cleanup
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Prisoners of war in the American Revolutionary War (talk) Expand
231 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Screech owl (talk) Expand
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga (talk) Expand
126 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Superluminal motion (talk) Unencyclopaedic
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Walter Butler (Loyalist) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Benjamin Hinman (talk) Unencyclopaedic
993 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: B Battles of Lexington and Concord (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Economic development in Azerbaijan (talk) Merge
161 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Yellow-eyed penguin (talk) Merge
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Second Saratoga order of battle (talk) Wikify
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The Smiling Ghost (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start WLUR (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Anders Johansson (artist manager) (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Southern Shield (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Shawqi al-Shaykh (talk) Orphan
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Statue of George Washington (Austin, Texas) (talk) Stub
35 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Republic of Zakopane (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dirty Linen and New-Found-Land (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jonathan Odell (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Nadarzyn (talk) Stub
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Exit Control List (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

I did explain it

It is uncited. OR. It cannot be restored without RS refs. Per wp:burden. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46&diff=cur 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 00:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

In addition, not only was your note to me untrue. So was your edit summary here. I added nothing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irrigation_in_Iran&diff=prev&oldid=1194248373 --2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 00:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Kindly self-revert or supply RS refs, so as to no longer be in non-compliance with wp:burden. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 00:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes, the content was uncited, and some of your contributions are constructive, when you removed information with an old "citation needed" tag, but in this case WP:BURDEN applies to you too since BURDEN states that "If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." You added more uncited material, so I reverted it. I will not revert any of your changes further so another uninvolved editor can take a look at them, but please bear this in mind. Happy editing ‍ Relativity 00:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
No - I don't think it is verifiable. And I did not - as I said above - add more uncited material. You are wrong. Again. Kindly self-revert. Because you are now in direct conflict with wp:burden. Which states -- as you know, "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the contribution.[c]".2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 01:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
But at least the content is there, and it's not violating BLP. Since you've also added uncited content, you also have to add citations to your content. ‍ Relativity 01:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
1. BLP is not a reason for you to restore uncited material, without complying with wp:burden. It has nothing to do with this conversation. 2. How many times do I have to say I did not add uncited content - only to have you ignore that. You are mistaken. I can't understand - as a good faith editor - why you keep on insisting on a blanket falsehood. That did not happen. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 01:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay, I was mentioning BLP because if the content was uncited then yes you should have— sigh, just forget I mentioned BLP. But why then do I not see a citation with the content you're adding? Am I missing anything? [1] ‍ Relativity 01:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Apparently you are not missing something, but imagining something that is not the case. What content do you imagine I added? 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
How about On the island orchards of date palm are found on tidal irrigation in the desert climate, although many date palms were destroyed during the Iran–Iraq War., which you added? I didn't see a citation attached to that. ‍ Relativity 01:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  • That's in the original. Look at the left column of the diff. All that was done was a single-sentence para was not left dangling as such. Nothing was added. If you look at the diff, it is obvious. And so minor it by itself would not even call for an edit summary. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
    Yes, I did miss that, but then why did you keep it if you're removing uncited content? Look, I'm going to go to WP:ANI, but only because I really don't know what to do here. ‍ Relativity 01:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
    1. Because I did not remove content that I thought may be verifiable. 2. ANI is not a help desk if you do not understand the clearly written wp:burden, and how you are not abiding by it. ANI is - as also clearly stated - for urgent incidents and chronic, unmanageable behavioral problems. Why would you go there? 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D5AE:2D16:B03B:9C46 (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
    Well, the other content that you removed could have been verifiable as well. ‍ Relativity 01:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your signature

I noticed that you have changed your signature to one which is virtually unreadable because it has poor MOS:CONTRAST. Any chance of a tweak to conform with WP:SIGAPP? Bazza (talk) 13:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

@Bazza 7 Yes, thank you. I was a bit worried about it as well, but decided to keep it to see if there would be a problem with it. I've tweaked it. ‍ Relativity 02:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Alulutho.M (21:53, 12 January 2024)

Hello , how can I said a feed back when the article doesn't answer my question --Alulutho.M (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Spacetechchik (21:39, 8 January 2024)

Hello, mentor. I sent a question a number of weeks ago and have not had a response that I can see. I've created an article on the International Space Elevator Consortium -- this is an organization and not the space elevator page. And wondering the process for getting it viewable by anyone on Wikipedia. Thanks, Kathe Jackson --Spacetechchik (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@Spacetechchik: Sorry for the wait! First, make sure that the organization is truly notable, and if you're connected to the subject in any way and have a WP:COI, I would strongly discourage creating the article yourself. If you don't have a conflict of interest and you think that the organization is notable, you should follow the steps written out at WP:AFC. Happy editing and let me know if you have any questions ‍ Relativity 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
I do not have any conflict of interest. In fact, I am a retired communications professional who is interested in this topic and did the research into the organization, which is respected, has had international affiliations and conferences, and is very much in agreement that a wiki page be created for their group and not just lumped into the "space elevator" category. I've already created the draft page following the directions, did my 10 edits (and more), and submitted. My question is about the process that follows. I've heard nothing back, except possibly it can take 6 months. Does it take that long? How will I know if it is accepted or requires additional editing? Here is a link to the pdf in the sandbox: file:///C:/Users/krjac/Downloads/User_2603_9001_2002_2BB2_0_0_0_1006_sandbox_International_Space_Elevator_Consortium%20(1).pdf. Thanks again! Spacetechchik (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
@Spacetechchik: As a reviewer at AfC, I know that it shouldn't take 6 months right now, but expect it take at least a few weeks. Just be patient. ‍ Relativity 02:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited George Washington in the French and Indian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caesar's Commentaries. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from EnterTheInfoSaviour (16:24, 14 January 2024)

Hey! How do I change the tone of an in-universe page, or write a page from and out-of-universe perspective? Also, how do I cite sources for food items? Are recipes allowed? Thanks for the information. --EnterTheInfoSaviour (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

@EnterTheInfoSaviour: I'm glad that you're interested in improving Wikipedia. I would read WP:TONE for your first question. For your second question, I would take a look at WP:CITE and as far as recipes are concerned, I would say probably not (with exceptions.) because let's say that you want to say that a cake includes flour and you cite a recipe. Well, there could be all kinds of recipes for cakes that don't use flour. I could see you citing a recipe if you were saying "Chef so-and-so writes in his recipe book that twelve eggs are needed for his cake." and cited the recipe book. Anyway, I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any more questions ‍ Relativity 04:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I didn't really understand the part about the second question. Could you elaborate?
Also, in the first question, I was asking about Wiki articles written on fictional characters, and how to write those.
Thanks for the help! EnterTheInfoSaviour (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nolansfood (22:56, 16 January 2024)

Hello, I'd like to privately ask you a question. How can I send you an email? --Nolansfood (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@Nolansfood: I don't have email currently enabled, so you can't. Is the question something that can be answered by someone else? I can point you to some trustworthy users. Cheers ‍ Relativity 02:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes please, and I would like the discussion to remain private. Thank you Nolansfood (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
@Nolansfood: Don't worry, only the user you're sending the email to will see it.
Let me know if you need help finding someone who would help with something specific ‍ Relativity 03:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Oh, and also, if you need to contact the Arbitration Committee, take a look here. ‍ Relativity 03:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
But just in case the oversighter that you pick isn't available, I would go here first. Cheers ‍ Relativity 03:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Just general questions for now. Doesn't seem like I will need that. Thank you though. Nolansfood (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from IbrahimDawod (11:02, 19 January 2024)

Hi, I am a youth football player in the 3rd division of Jordan Football (youth). I want to know how to make a page for me and be sure to get it approved. --IbrahimDawod (talk) 11:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

@IbrahimDawod If you are truly notable then someone else will make a Wikipedia page for you at some point. You have a conflict of interest and therefore are strongly discouraged from creating a Wikipedia article about yourself. ‍ Relativity 00:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Caribbeangospeltv (15:23, 20 January 2024)

Hi, I'm trying to add my business here --Caribbeangospeltv (talk) 15:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Pedroh001 (17:20, 21 January 2024)

Como traduzir um artigo? --Pedroh001 (talk) 17:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Beaniemtrx (21:27, 22 January 2024)

what is your opinion on me getting rejected from an art school in austria --Beaniemtrx (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

@Beaniemtrx I have no idea. Do you have any questions about improving Wikipedia? ‍ Relativity 20:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Waseem magsi110 (18:08, 28 January 2024)

How can I add a new article?\ --Waseem magsi110 (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

@Waseem magsi110 Here are the steps:
1. Figure out the subject you want to write an article on, and make sure it isn't in Bad Article Ideas.
2. Make sure your topic is truly notable, that you can write about it from a neutral point of view, and that you don't have a conflict of interest.
3. You may want to take a look at the WP:MOS (or, alternately, a simplified version of it)
4. Follow the instructions at WP:AfC
5. Wait until someone reviews the article. This could take up to a few months. They may accept it, which means that your article is now in the mainspace— hooray!— or they could decline it, meaning that you would have to make improvement before it's accepted.
Hope this helps ‍ Relativity 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

New message from Relativity

Hello, Relativity. You have new messages at Relativity's talk page.
Message added 02:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

‍ Relativity 02:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nolansfood (22:23, 31 January 2024)

I have a question regarding editing this map. It is only showing 16 out of the 46 coordinates, and when I open the "full interactive map" in the hyperlink it then says there are 62 coordinates. When you click on the map it shows 16 coordinates. The hyperlink then shows 62, which is confusing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_Bourbon_Trail#Trail_stops --Nolansfood (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

@Nolansfood, you are right. Perhaps the editors could not find the exact coordinates for everything they wanted to put on the map? Have you thought about discussing this on the article's talk page? ‍ Relativity 22:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The coordinates are exact, I checked. The problem is the full list of 46 coordinates don't show up unless you click on the hyperlink "full interactive map". The next issue is that when you go there the numbering is off. It shows there are 62 coordinates.
Do you have any guide or editor you know that is good with this? Nolansfood (talk) 22:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
@Nolansfood The Wikipedians at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous will probably be more helpful in this topic than I can be due to my limited knowledge of maps on Wikipedia. You also might be interested in asking here at Wikivoyage, since they might be more experienced in working with digital maps than the editors at the Misc ref desk, although they aren't on Wikipedia, so there may be some technical limitations, I don't know. Hope this helps ‍ Relativity 22:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nolansfood (08:09, 6 February 2024)

How do userpages get protection? I researched it and did not get the answer I wanted. I noticed some user pages cannot be edited. --Nolansfood (talk) 08:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@Nolansfood Take a look at WP:RFPP. Let me know if you have any questions ‍ Relativity 03:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

A message from SYNTHWAVER MAN

Hi. ForDraft:Downtown Binary i cannot find other sources. please tell me what to do. Thanks! SYNTHWAVER MAN (talk) 19:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@SYNTHWAVER MAN For your draft, if you can't find any more sources, then the artist is not notable and therefore doesn't deserve their own Wikipedia article. I would suggest helping out in other aspects of Wikipedia so you can get a feel for notability before you attempt to write an article. Writing articles is one of the hardest things that a Wikipedian can do. ‍ Relativity 03:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Ok thanks! SYNTHWAVER MAN (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for catching and fixing the vandalism on the Choropleth maps page. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 02:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
@GeogSage, wow, thank you! ‍ Relativity 05:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Naterator8 (19:19, 12 February 2024)

Hello, :)

I am wondering how you guys like your sources. I know that you want a source for pretty much all articles or information written, but what about if I am a family member? For example, there is an article written about the Anderson Rd. in Calgary, Canada. I am a family member on the people who made the road and I see a lot of misinformation in the article. However, how can I make my edits get approved if the only sources I have are from my family? --Naterator8 (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Naterator8, you can't. There is one main reason why you can't, and another burden:
1. (The main reason) That's still considered original research. Wikipedia's information is required to be published by reliable, independent, published sources. Since the only place you can get your information from is from yourself or interviewing your family member, you can't add that on Wikipedia.
2. (A burden) You have a conflict of interest. This means that it's not wise for you to edit the article. If you have reliable sources to back up any claims you make, you can make an edit request on the article's talk page.
Let me know if you have any further questions, and for answers from a more general amount of people, you should go to the Teahouse. I'll send you a list of helpful links on your talk page. ‍ Relativity 01:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from MuzamilJamali (13:01, 13 February 2024)

Hello, how are you? --MuzamilJamali (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

@MuzamilJamali Pretty good, how are you? Do you have any questions about editing Wikipedia? ‍ Relativity 04:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm good,
I appreciate your response. I'm already familiar with Wikipedia editing. MuzamilJamali (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nolansfood (23:49, 14 February 2024)

How long does a deletion request last? Does an admin get assigned or does an admin need to be contacted? I noticed a picture on the Wikimedia commons up for over 1 week and I think it is WP:ZEALOUS. Consensus is keep. Here is the link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Authentication_certificate.png --Nolansfood (talk) 23:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

@Nolansfood Since it's on Commons, I can't really help you here. If it's like Wikipedia's deletion system, seven days, or sometimes less if an admin spots it and it's an overwhelming keep or delete. Looking at the discussion, if it's like Wikipedia's deletion system, I would guess you have to wait seven days. You should ask at the Commons help desk; they'll know way more about the deletion process than I will. ‍ Relativity 01:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

A message from Arnavgochuswami

you rejected this article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Balkishan_Agrawal


please tell me reasons and solutions so that i can be live on wikipedia. please tell corrections that should be made


Arnavgochuswami (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

@Arnavgochuswami I didn't reject it— I declined it, which means that you can still submit and make improvements. I declined it because it wasn't supported by reliable sources. Please read the link I provided and WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE before you resubmit. ‍ Relativity 02:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Dr Sunil Gupta Nagpur (07:38, 19 February 2024)

Hello, How to create new Wikipedia page --Dr Sunil Gupta Nagpur (talk) 07:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

@Dr Sunil Gupta Nagpur Please read WP:Your first article. Let me know if you have any further questions ‍ Relativity 23:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

MOS:ERA

Please read the page you cited: "Use either the BC–AD or the BCE–CE notation consistently within the same article. Exception: do not change direct quotations, titles, etc." Your statement of "Per MOS:BCE we use BCE instead of BC." is wrong. The article inconsistently used BCE and AD, so I imposed consistency, and you turned it back to inconsistency. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello IP editor. Thank you for noting that. Feel free to restore to your version. ‍ Relativity 20:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

hello!

hello to you, user! I was looking at the adopt me page on Wikipedia and thought I could be adopted by you (if you want too)! I like editing articles on Taiwanese articles because their english articles could be a lot better and more organised (and until a few hours ago, I've been obsessively adding userboxes to my user page haha). I've edited with IPs before, but understood all the WP:(insert something) language and I hope if you adopt me (or if you choose not to), I could learn a couple of things from you too! Thank you for considering and reading my application, please ask me more questions should you want/need to! Cheers to you! Joséthewikier (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

@Joséthewikier It's great to know that you're interested! I see that you've also posted on User talk:SkyWolf369, User talk:Frostly, User talk:EchidnaLives, User talk: TheTechnician27, and User talk:Blaze Wolf asking if they can adopt you. I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but I don't know if it's preferable for you to be adopted by many users at once. However, I would be interested in adopting you if you are! I honestly don't have much experience editing Taiwanese articles, but I can help you in some other places such as countering vandalism, learning a bit more about content creation such as improving (and maybe even creating) an article, and working in some internal project spaces. Just let me know if you want to start with me (and if so, what you want to learn about) and let me know if you need anything. ‍ Relativity 23:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
hello! I'm sorry I thought this would be like a college application process! Well, I'm really not sure how to go about having sent requests to 6 users, though anyway I'm extremely appreciative that you're willing to assist me in editing! Now my question is really wondering who should adopt me haha. Joséthewikier (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
oh yea. one question I have is really what I am needed here in Wikipedia. I'm not sure how I could be a better user here, and I want to be a good user here on Wikipedia! Joséthewikier (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
@Relativity i'm sorry i forgot to tag! Joséthewikier (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
@Joséthewikier Hey, sorry for the late response. You can choose who should adopt you, or I think you could go with multiple people adopting you. I think you could be a good user. What are you interested in? Also, to get some ideas of what you might enjoy doing on Wikipedia, I would visit the WP:Task Center. Cheers, and let me know if you need anything ‍ Relativity 05:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Joeworgan (09:27, 22 February 2024)

How do i get my Axelent article live? --Joeworgan (talk) 09:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

@Joeworgan You need to make sure that your draft meets the criteria outlined in the template in the beginning of it. Once you do that, click "Submit the draft for review!" and an Articles for Creation reviewer will come and choose whether or not it's suitable for the article mainspace. Cheers ‍ Relativity 00:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Study Of Diabetes In India

The Research Society for Study Of Diabetes In India (RSSDI) will test random blood sugar levels of one million people on World Heart Day (September 29) to raise awareness about diabetes and officially attempt to create a world record. Officially called “One Nation, One Day, One Million Blood Sugar Testing” will be a first-of-its-kind event. In Nagpur, free blood sugar testing will be available at more than 50 sites, including at leading medical shops. Dr Sunil Gupta Nagpur (talk) 10:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

@Dr Sunil Gupta Nagpur That sounds cool. Now, do you have any questions about improving and/or editing Wikipedia? That's what I'm here for. ‍ Relativity 22:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from KAIGIL (09:05, 27 February 2024)

helo how do i creat a virtual machine --KAIGIL (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from সফিউল ইসলাম (11:08, 27 February 2024)

Hello Sir, I want to change my Wiki username, can you please help me in this regard --সফিউল ইসলাম (talk) 11:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@সফিউল ইসলাম, see WP:Username change. Cheers ‍ Relativity 02:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

hello! (continued)

Hello User Relativity! I want to officially request that you review me as your potential adoptee! I don't know how that would work, but I'm more than happy to answer any questions you might ask me! Have a great day ahead! Joséthewikier (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Joséthewikier, that's great! There's no actual "formal" process, but basically I'll be helping you with things you need help with and teaching you things that you want to be taught. What are you interested in learning about around Wikipedia? I can help with that. Happy editing and let me know if you have any questions ‍ Relativity 02:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

FRRHHEd

I added a citation for this to the page, hopefully did that correctly, Cheers. 213.226.67.38 (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello IP user, and I checked the citation you added in there. Yes, that does seem to be correct. Thank you ‍ Relativity 01:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Question from Joséthewikier (06:54, 28 February 2024)

Hey! I want to translate some Chinese articles into English. Maybe a good example to start would be https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9B%9B%E9%80%9A%E6%A1%A5. I hope you can give me some tips on how I could do that! Thank you! --Joséthewikier (talk) 06:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Joséthewikier The basics are described at Help:Translation and WP:Translation. Another thing that you may like to know about is that when you are at the extended-confirmed user access level (which means that you have to have been here for thirty days and made 500 edits) you gain access to the Wikipedia:Content translation tool which should aid you more in translating if that's something that you're more interested in. But you don't actually have to be extended-confirmed to translate articles; you just have to be to use that tool. Anyway, happy editing and let me know if you have any further questions ‍ Relativity 01:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Joséthewikier (talk) 08:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

A message from Shonyx

Happy Leap Day tommorow! greeted by Shalomie 👩🏿‍🦱 (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 12:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

@Shonyx Thank you, and you too! ‍ Relativity 03:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boot Monument, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Holt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from OTIKA ISAAC (11:45, 3 March 2024)

what are the ways through which negative effects imprisonment can be avoided --OTIKA ISAAC (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

A message from Tomlovesfar

Custom signatures should link to your user page, your user talk page, or your contributions. Currently your signature points to only your user talk page.

I've noticed that you like the color pink, so here is a signature Idea for you

‍ Relativity ‍ Talk!

btw you really have a nice looking talk page and userpage.

‍‍ TomLovesFar ‍💬 08:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

@Tomlovesfar Thanks for the notification, and thank you for the compliment. According to [2], it's okay if my signature only links to my talk page. Plus, there's nothing in WP:SIGNATURE that says I have to link to both my user page and talk page. I would have linked to both except I ran out of character room in my preferences and I'm not interested in adding anything to Special:MyPage/common.css. Anyway this works fine and anyone looking to read my user page can do so by clicking on it once they get to my talk page. I like your idea for the style though! ‍ Relativity 23:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from Jotham Mapenhure Zvinongoza on User:Jotham Mapenhure Zvinongoza/sandbox (14:43, 12 March 2024)

Hello, may you help me to edit my new write up about Kefas who is deceased on my sand box. --Jotham Mapenhure Zvinongoza (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

A message from Spacetechchik

Good afternoon. It has been several months, and I have still not heard back on status from Wiki. My correspondence with you has been archived and is below for your reference. Is there anything I should know or do?

From you: Sorry for the wait! First, make sure that the organization is truly notable, and if you're connected to the subject in any way and have a WP:COI, I would strongly discourage creating the article yourself. If you don't have a conflict of interest and you think that the organization is notable, you should follow the steps written out at WP:AFC. Happy editing and let me know if you have any questions ‍ Relativity 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

From me: I do not have any conflict of interest. In fact, I am a retired communications professional who is interested in this topic and did the research into the organization, which is respected, has had international affiliations and conferences, and is very much in agreement that a wiki page be created for their group and not just lumped into the "space elevator" category. I've already created the draft page following the directions, did my 10 edits (and more), and submitted. My question is about the process that follows. I've heard nothing back, except possibly it can take 6 months. Does it take that long? How will I know if it is accepted or requires additional editing? Here is a link to the pdf in the sandbox: file:///C:/Users/krjac/Downloads/User_2603_9001_2002_2BB2_0_0_0_1006_sandbox_International_Space_Elevator_Consortium%20(1).pdf. Thanks again! Spacetechchik (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

From you: As a reviewer at AfC, I know that it shouldn't take 6 months right now, but expect it take at least a few weeks. Just be patient. ‍ Relativity 02:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks again,

Kathe Jackson Spacetechchik (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Spacetechchik (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

@Spacetechchik: Thanks for checking in. I have gone ahead and moved your draft from User:2603:9001:2002:2BB2:0:0:0:1006/sandbox/International Space Elevator Consortium to Draft:International Space Elevator Consortium and submitted it so it is in the WP:AFC queue, and therefore should be reviewed in a reasonable amount of time. For your question on whether it will take six months or not, I would say probably not since the oldest draft that is in the queue right now is just over two months old, and usually the drafts that take six months are ones where it's hard to figure out if the subject meets the general notability guideline. If it is accepted or declined, you will receive a notification about it on your talk page, and if it is declined, you will receive reasoning on why it was declined.
Looking at your draft currently, there are a few problems. The first one is its language. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and therefore needs to be written in a neutral tone. In your draft, there are sentences like ISEC is a leading voice in the space elevator community and plays a key role in advancing the development of this revolutionary new transportation system and promote a revolutionary and efficient way for humans to access space using these technologies, to name a few. This type of language is not acceptable on a Wikipedia article. Please read WP:IMPARTIAL for guidance on this.
Your second problem is that there are many external links within the article. The only place where external links outside of Wikipedia should go is in an "External links" section. For your draft, the only external link (in my opinion) that should be in that section is the official website. In your draft, there are links to LinkedIn and too many to the company's website. Please read Wikipedia:External links for some guidance on what to do there.
Your fourth problem is that the topic is already covered at Space elevator#International Space Elevator Consortium (ISEC). While this is not a major problem, it may also mean that editors feel that the topic should not be covered any more. If that was the only problem however, I would tell you to go along and keep editing your draft.
Your last and most major problem is your lack of adequate sourcing. There is no citation for the "Origins" section of your history section, and for the "Activities" section. Your three citations are not going to be enough to make your topic qualify for WP:ORG. Why don't you take a look at Space elevator#International Space Elevator Consortium (ISEC)? There are some citations there that would help. Please read WP:N and WP:ORG.
It is not the end of the road for your draft if it is declined. If it is declined, you can still make edits to your draft and resubmit it. If it is rejected, then you can't resubmit your draft. If it's accepted, congratulations! But writing an article is one of the hardest things you can do on Wikipedia. My suggestion is to start small and gain experience on other parts of Wikipedia before you write an article. Some things you can do are outlined at WP:Task Center. One last link I would encourage you to read is WP:Your first article. It has many tips to help you out with writing your article.
Sorry for the not-so-detailed response last time. I'm not going to review your article since I think that there should be some fresh eyes on it, but I will make a comment that links to this discussion. I'll also link some helpful links on your talk page. Let me know if you have any further questions. ‍ Relativity 19:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from BowWowowwowwow on Harrison Nichols (19:37, 23 March 2024)

Ive made a mistake in the code because idk what I'm doing. Can you fix it --BowWowowwowwow (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

@BowWowowwowwow I saw your edits on Harrison Nichols. They do seem to be causing some issues with the infobox. I can fix it quickly by reverting your edits, or you can specify what you want to be added and I can do my best to make it look how you want it to. It's great that you want to help improve Wikipedia. One thing that you should do is, if you don't know Wikipedia:Wikimarkup (and I didn't before I started contributing to Wikipedia and just gradually learned), you probably should not start out doing more technical edits involving infoboxes and templates, and perhaps start on some of the easier things outlined in the task center. Using WP:VisualEditor is also a great tool. See Help:Getting Started. Let me know if you have any further questions ‍ Relativity 21:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from Sonam Infinite (21:22, 22 March 2024)

hi, how are you? i want to add my work into Wikipedia. how do I do that? can u advice pls? --Sonam Infinite (talk) 21:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

@Sonam Infinite Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Since you have a conflict of interest, it is not a good idea for you to create your own article about yourself. Please read WP:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. If you are truly notable, then someone else will create an article about you. Let me know if you need clarifications or have any further questions. ‍ Relativity 21:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thank you so much! appreciate it. take care. 2607:FEA8:58E0:2900:F55D:4CC7:D5A5:65A5 (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from Gejmonker on User talk:Gejmonker (11:15, 25 March 2024)

how to create a page --Gejmonker (talk) 11:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Gejmonker, a Wikipedia article is one of the hardest things to do on Wikipedia. Before you do that, you might be interested in gaining a bit more experience in areas of Wikipedia. Some of those areas are outlined in the Task Center. If you feel that you are ready to create your own article, please read Help:Your first article. Let me know if you have any further questions ‍ Relativity 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nana waffles on Talk:Uncle Waffles (07:33, 28 March 2024)

Hey how can I tell uncle waffles that I love her and she's my role model? --Nana waffles (talk) 07:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Siyal and chamar two different caste but the writer wrote siyal and chamar in one caste.Her source was talk to siyal and chamar two different caste but the writer wrote wrong theory and he was protect this page. Source are provided siyal and chamar are two different there are :- *(1) The Constitution (Scheduled caste) Order of 1950 Book, Page number 167 and 168 castes serial list 18 chamar and 86 siyal caste. *(2)Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI), Odisha , (3)Singh, K.S.; Anthropological Survey of India (1992): People of India: Odisha (2 pts.) Page number 323 and 214 provide siyal and Chamar different caste (4)The Scheduled Caste Population in Odisha book 03:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Siyal and chamar two different caste but the writer wrote siyal and chamar in one caste.Her source was talk to siyal and chamar two different caste but the writer wrote wrong theory and he was protect this page. Source are provided siyal and chamar are two different there are :- *(1) The Constitution (Scheduled caste) Order of 1950 Book, Page number 167 and 168 castes serial list 18 chamar and 86 siyal caste. *(2)Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI), Odisha , (3)Singh, K.S.; Anthropological Survey of India (1992): People of India: Odisha (2 pts.) Page number 323 and 214 provide siyal and Chamar different caste (4)The Scheduled Caste Population in Odisha book 03:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) Ramachbehera1 (talk) 03:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

@Ramachbehera1 Hello, and I assume this is about Siyal (caste)? If so, please follow what the reviewer told you on the talk page of the article: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. It's not clear what you're trying to tell me and the editors at the Teahouse what you're trying to say. ‍ Relativity 03:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Only delete Chamar name and Chamar releted theory in thi article Ramachbehera1 (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Only delete chamar on heading and chamar releted theory in this article. Ramachbehera1 (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Warfare Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maximiliano Hernández Martínez on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Silaz218 (03:16, 10 April 2024)

Hello, I'm new here. In theory can I create articles about anything in the real world if they haven't been made yet? --Silaz218 (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@Silaz218, yes, but please read Wikipedia:Your first article. Wikipedia requires things to be covered by independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. Also, see WP:GNG. Plus, creating articles from scratch is a hard thing to do when you're starting out. (Some good recommendations for what you can do to improve Wikipedia are available at the task center.) Anyway, welcome! Let me know if you need anything or have any further questions ‍Relativity ⚡️ 03:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from JohanTheMagician (06:04, 10 April 2024)

Hi! Wow, 500k edits? Crazy impressive! My name is Johan, I love Wikipedia, but realised there is way to little written about communication and advertisning, especially the history of it. Many of the most important agencies through history are not even mentioned, especially the ones from the early days. But I thought I'd start by adding some tiny information about some of the "founding fathers" like Ogilvy. Some questions if you have time: Do you have any tips on where to start? Is it considered most valuable to add footnotes from books or from Internet sources? --JohanTheMagician (talk) 06:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@JohanTheMagician Hello! I'm pretty sure I don't have 500k edits... I thought I had almost 3k... wait... do I sleep-edit??? Anyway, about your question about books vs. internet sources, the answer is, it depends. What we're looking for are reliable sources, whether they are from a book or from an internet source. From my experience, books usually tend to be more reliable than internet sources, but not necessarily. There are some books that cite or are mirrors or forks of Wikipedia and therefore are not reliable. Similarly, there are internet sources that are not reliable. For example, a Reddit post would not be considered reliable. What you would need to do is find reliable sources (You should also read what I just linked there.) Anyway, happy editing! Let me know if you have any further questions. ‍Relativity ⚡️ 23:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Ha ha. Thanks @Relativity for a swift answer. I understand your point of books referring to each other. This will be super interesting. JohanTheMagician (talk) 05:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
When it comes to advertising, there's a special issue with so many of the "sources" being authored by the agencies themselves. For instance, Ogilvy, which played a significant role in Advertising history, is one example. On the Ogilvy wikipedia page the agency's own 50-year jubilee book is quoted as a "source" for their successes. Even though it is a published book from Random House this seems a little swampy. Well, well, I'm looking forward to this, and to learn more! JohanTheMagician (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Djong (ship) has an RfC

Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boot Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boot Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 11:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boot Monument

The article Boot Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boot Monument for comments about the article, and Talk:Boot Monument/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Relativity :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Warfare Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Defence of Duffer's Drift on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi relativity

Hi! My name is Starsplitterfanfare, and I might have one (or two) questions to ask. Ok 1. How do you edit semi protected articles? because I tried to edit one and it said that there was an error. 2. Does my name violate the username policy, because my username is pretty lengthy, If it does, I will request to change it. thank you for listening, bye! Starsplitterfanfare~enwiki (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Starsplitterfanfare~enwiki: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! For your first question, semi-protected articles can only be edited once a user has been on Wikipedia for four days and made ten edits— also being called confirmed. See Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection. You have made more than ten edits, but you haven't been here for four days, which is the problem. For your second question, no, it does not. Having a long username is not preferable since it can be confusing to other editors (see WP:UNCONF), but your username is fine. Cheers, and let me know if you have any further questions ‍Relativity ⚡️ 17:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Relativity/Archive_2&oldid=1222928225"