User talk:Pottyantós WC

This is Pottyantós WC's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nissan GTR-50 (September 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.nissan-global.com/EN/INNOVATION/DESIGN/DESIGNWORKS/GT-R50/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Nissan GTR-50 may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pottyantós WC! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pottyantós WC[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Pottyantós WC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the speedy deletion request, but I have moved the page to Draft:Francisco Franco de Sousa, for two reasons. Firstly, that is a more suitable title for a draft article. A Wikipedia user page is for someone who is active in working for the project to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to post any other kind of material. Secondly, you created the page by copying and pasting the content of an existing page; doing so loses the editing history of the page, which must be kept to satisfy Wikipedia's copyright licensing terms. I have joined the editing histories of the two pages together. JBW (talk) 10:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jüri Vips. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:ACCOUNTDELETION[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:ACCOUNTDELETION, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pottyantós WC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An instant permanent ban for disturptive editing is like giving someone the death penalty for speeding.~ . Pottyantós WC (talk) 18:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused. This is not an "instant permanent ban". This is a block without an end date, which only means that it will be removed when you can convince an admin to remove it. You haven't done so here. You made disruptive edits but don't indicate any understanding of this or tell what you will do differently. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) No, it's not. It's much more like instantly banning someone from an art museum for harassing other museum-goers and throwing paint at a Matisse. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And for that matter, for some unfortunate drivers speeding does get them killed ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and the page for George Hangay was not only not vandalism, but he genuinely exists. He has a page on the Hungarian Wikipedia.

That means nothing on the English Wikipedia. We have strict standards for inclusion here. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pottyantós WC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maybe give me a topic ban instead of an indefinite block? I think that can solve this.Pottyantós WC (talk) 04:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) While waiting for an admin to come and look at your request... on hu.wiki you seem to be blocked as a sock of Balázs6. Any comments? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've never used that account on the English wikipedia and never will. -Pottyantós WC (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, but how will a topic ban prevent your disruptive editing? 331dot (talk) 09:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That still makes this account a violation of WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pottyantós WC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read every single rulebook of Wikipedia and I am aware that creating empty pages is considered disruptive editing. I promise to use this ONE AND ONLY account on the English Wikipedia, and I won't even THINK about creating or using another one. Pottyantós WC (talk) 14:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for creating empty pages, nor for sockpuppetry. You were blocked for disruptive editing. Your next unblock request should acknowledge that and have a clear plan for how to move forward. Please read WP:GAB. – bradv 16:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pottyantós WC (talk) 14:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]