User talk:Owen.331

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SounderBruce 00:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Whatcom Transportation Authority shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SounderBruce 04:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest taking detailed fleet information to CPTDB Wiki or another fansite. Wikipedia is not meant for niche content that is not verifiable. Unless there is an accessible page from a reliable source (think The Bellingham Herald or a non-WTA government entity) that lists details like the paint schemes and engine systems, it should be left out. SounderBruce 04:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]