User talk:Ovnion

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wireless signal extraction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wireless signal extraction was changed by Ovnion (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-11-08T12:26:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cellint

A tag has been placed on Cellint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 12:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cellint

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Cellint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. bonadea contributions talk 13:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Advertisements

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Cellint, you will be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP, OF THE PAGE!!!

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your pattern of editing

What is your connection with the company Cellint? All of your edits here have fit one of these patterns:

• 1. You have blanked out information, without discussing it on the talk pages of the articles, about terms used by rivals to a company called Cellint.
• 2. You have inserted information about terminology apparently used by Cellint.
• 3. You have tried twice to write articles about this company called Cellint, using language that is promotional in nature and without explaining why this company is notable enough to be in an encyclopedia.
• 4. You have posted false complaints that you were trying to add a term "cellint" to Wikipedia, when in fact you were trying to write about a company of that name.
• 5. You have falsely accused me of deleting the article Cellint.

Do you understand that alterations to article should be discussed on the talk pages of those articles? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

If you feel your employer is notable, then you should propose that some impartial third party create an article about them. Be prepared to offer some solid references (i.e., not to their own website). --Orange Mike | Talk 14:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

When you feel an "article" is advertisement

Tag it with a proposed deletion tag (see WP:PROD for details). When you feel a passage within an article is an advertisement and you have a conflict of interest because you work for somebody competing with the "advertiser", bring up the issue on the relevant article(s)' talk page(s), disclosing your COI when you do so. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)