User talk:Nnn edits

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto Yeah, Sorry for that but i have fix my error Nnn edits (talk) 11:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto

how to Create a Page on Wikipedia English?

Please Help me Nnn edits (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a tutorial at Help:Your first article with an "Article Wizard" to help you through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto

Where i can create a article? Nnn edits (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you can use the Wikipedia:Article wizard and it will take you through steps to do so. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto

At the Step "" Enter your Draft name "" there is no option available next

Please guide me step by step Nnn edits (talk) 14:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You enter the name of your draft article. At that point you can continue. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ThaddeusSholto There is no option available for continue. Nnn edits (talk) 16:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is. After you enter the name of your proposed article, the button below the textbox will turn blue and you can click it. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Khan Bela, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone The name of Article and The Redirected article is not Same.

I suggest you to Delete the {{Khan Bela}} page. Nnn edits (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such template. Anyway, if you wish to delete the redirect then you need to create a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone

i talk about this article.This is not is use or empty from couple of years and new Page from Same name is in Review which is Better.Please delete this Page. Nnn edits (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion at WP:RFDHOWTO then Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aena Khan (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aena Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer There is no reason for rejecting my article.Please clear the Rejection reason.I work hard on this.Please don't disappoint me. Nnn edits (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nnn edits: Wikipedia only contains articles about notable subjects. At the moment, the draft you have created about Aena Khan does not sufficiently demonstrate that she meets the WP:NACTOR criteria, and the wording is too promotional, with words like "famous", "loved", "appreciated", "stars", "most popular", "celebrity", "strong", and "highly sought-after". These words don't belong in an encyclopedia article.

I haven't 'rejected' your draft, I have only 'declined' it. This means you can continue to improve it and then re-submit it for review once you've addressed these concerns. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer I understand that,I have made some changes in It and resubmit the article and I Hope you will accept it now Nnn edits (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You resubmitted it without having improved it. The problems remained, so I reverted your submission. Please don't waste reviewers' time by submitting drafts that aren't ready. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nnn edits! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aena Khan (October 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aena Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong There is no reason for declined my Article.Pleaee accept it and i will fix my errors after. Nnn edits (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are new to editing Wikipedia, so you may not be familiar with the standards we have here. If you want to fit in you should try to familiarise yourselves with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria such as WP:NACTOR. Theroadislong is a very experienced editor here, and if they say the article isn't suitable, you should take notice rather than try to persuade them that you are right and they are wrong. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer The page is now modified and we made some changes.I hope you will accept it now. Nnn edits (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aena Khan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aena Khan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong ok im removing it and please accept it now Nnn edits (talk) 08:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the tone is totally unacceptable for an encyclopaedia and there are not enough reliable independent sources to establish any notability, being "famous" is not one of the criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 09: 02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aena Khan (October 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR. However, I have created a redirect from Aena Khan to Fairy Tale (Pakistani TV series) as the only notable production she's acted in.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aena Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aena Khan (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted again with zero improvements. Please don't keep resubmitting without addressing the issues - it is a waste of volunteers' time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aena Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aena Khan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aena Khan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aena Khan (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Please Identify my mistakes and I will solve this.So you can accept my Article. Nnn edits (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nnn edits (talk) 10:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AUR Life (October 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AUR Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Fairy Tale (Pakistani TV series), List of programs broadcast by Hum TV and List of Pakistani television series. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay The Article is pending from 1 week.Please accept it and i will link to these articles. Nnn edits (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not exaggerate/ The article was submitted at 22:12, 28 October 2023‎, which is only 3.5 days, not a week, and as it clearly states
"Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more.
As I am not a new page reviewer I cannot accept it - Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namak Haram (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources, citations #1 and #2 are the same.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Namak Haram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces Ok i have fix it and Please Accept it now. Nnn edits (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces Another article which is pending from many days name

@Vanderwaalforces Please Accept a pending article from many days name. Nnn edits (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

. Please Accept it. Nnn edits (talk) 05:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Namak Haram (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need in-depth critical reviews from reputable publishers. Trailer and cast announcements are routine coverage so does not establish notability nor do interviews or comments from those affiliated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Namak Haram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Please review a pending article named Fairy Tale 2 Nnn edits (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairy Tale 2 (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are primary, are just announcements about the second season or lists. Need in-depth critical reviews about the show.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fairy Tale 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Please review another article named Sukoon Nnn edits (talk) 19:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I will leave any others for another reviewer but what I say if is you continue to submit drafts about non-notable topics, you might be blocked so I strongly suggest you take the time to read through all the messages left here and follow all the links. If you do not understand the material, then you can ask for help at the Teahouse but please be mindful comptence is required to edit here. S0091 (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 The Announcement or Coming the show was in Production section only that the What is coming.But i have made some changes and remove content from your refer comment on Submission. Nnn edits (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admins, suggest looking at 223.123.0.0/20 and note 223.123.2.24 is already blocked for being proxy. S0091 (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 i am editing from my original account on Wikipedia Nnn edits (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies mind taking a look at this, see also User talk:223.123.6.22. Even absent the IP activity, this user is exhibiting WP:CIR. S0091 (talk) 20:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nnn edits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware from Wikipedia Editing Policies and Conditions.I have read everything with details and I know what is my Purpose of Editing.I will not Revise my Past edits.I request you to Again to Unblock My Account Please.I Request you to Unblock me from Wikipedia.Thanks Nnn edits (talk) 05:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sock puppetry, but do not discuss that in this request. You will need to return to your original account to request unblocking. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.