User talk:NewerSouper

Luz Noceda[edit]

Looking at your edit on Luz Noceda, this part: Category:Neurodivergent fictional characters|ADHD is wrong. The ADHD after the pipe means that Luz Noceda will now be indexed on the Category:Neurodivergent fictional characters as ADHD, which is to say, will be found under 'A' not under 'L'. You should go back and remove the |ADHD.

Per my reply elsewhere, you are NOT at liberty to add fictional characters without articles to categories such as Category:Neurodivergent fictional characters. I hope that's understood. --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching that, I've only made like 3 edits total on any wiki so as you can imagine I'm not exactly up to standard. In fact the only reason I'm here is to make the documentation of ND fictional characters more thorough (mostly ADHD), with what I now know I'll just buckle down and try to make a page for fictional characters with ADHD. NewerSouper (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of fictional characters with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of fictional characters with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NewerSouper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of fictional characters with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (December 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanilla Wizard were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for your work on this draft. I am declining it at this time as this article does not adequately cite reliable sources. Source 1, metro.co.uk, is not reliable per WP:METRO. Sources 2 through 6 are YouTube videos, Reddit posts, and Twitter posts, which are user-generated content and not reliable sources. I would also recommend removing all columns except Character, Series, and Ref. as the rest are also unsourced. Source 7 may work for verifying that this character has ADHD, but not for establishing notability as it is a listing to purchase the book, not an independent secondary source. The same can be said of most sources in the Literature section. The film section again relies on a YouTube video. I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable and secondary sources, and to the helpful page WP:RS/P that allows you to do a Ctrl+F search to see if a source is considered unreliable. Please don't let this discourage you from continuing your work; it is very possible that high-quality sources are out there, but this draft will need its sourcing issues corrected before being resubmitted. Again, thank you for the time you put into this draft. It is possible it could become an article in the future, but it's just not ready yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of fictional characters with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanilla Wizard 💙 00:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]