User talk:Neuropol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This user is on the Wikimedia Community Discord.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This editor is a Journeyman Editor and is entitled to display the Journeyman Editor Ribbon.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page![edit]

My username has changed! If you know me by Personhumanperson, you are in the right place!

Any constructive feedback is welcome. I try to respond to everything, so please feel free to message me here for any reason.

Unless you are replying or adding to a discussion, please don't add your messages to a pre-existing category, I will sort them myself. They will automatically be in the incoming category.

align=centerleftAccomplishments[edit]

Below is a record of my accomplishments, such as article creations and user awards.

An archive of my accomplishments is here.

align=centerleft To do/review[edit]

Below are things I need to review, such as tips, notices, and things to do.

align=centerleftIncoming[edit]

These are messages that are new and haven't been sorted yet.

your reverting of my edits[edit]

Wikipedia policy states that unsourced material be removed, I have restored my edits... which WERE adequately described "rm uncourced" is the standard edit summary for this. Citations are needed before this content may be restored 204.78.11.9 (talk) 13:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you view visual diffs, you can find sourced content which was removed. Furthermore, your edits added blank spaces and patent nonsense such as "T". If you'd like to remove unsourced information, you are free to do so, however, please ensure all information removed is unsourced, and do not add patent nonsense. Also, it may be more beneficial to find sources instead of flat-out removing content. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 13:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the "T" was done in error.. and when it comes finding sources instead of to flat out removing content, Tell that to User:Waxworker he's been arbitrarily removing content I've added many times. 204.78.11.9 (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please ensure that all content you remove is unsourced. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 14:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever happened to Assume good faith? T1980 (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about WP:AGF? I never made any claim of bad faith, but sourced content was removed, and that was a necessary revision. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 14:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Templating the regulars[edit]

I take issue with that and it's considered rude, especially for someone who has been on here for 19 years T1980 (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure where you got the idea that I didn't like being templated, as I specified at the top of this page that I am indifferent to it. Furthermore, I can not find a single time of which I added a message to your user page, so this is odd for me to receive.
Did you mean to send this to someone else? Thanks,NeuropolTalk 14:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. You templated me when I removed the unsourced content on Paperboy (video game) you reverted it twice, when I made the edits from a public computer... Decided to do it again while logged in so you'd know I am an established (albeit semi-retired) user. T1980 (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, you found it disrespectful that I was unaware a specific IP was a logged-out regular? Thanks,NeuropolTalk 14:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no. I just thought that making the edits while logged in would have a little more clout. T1980 (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You do not receive any "clout" on Wikipedia. Unconstructive edits by established and unestablished editors will be reverted. I am happy to discuss the nature of the edits. However, I will not be considering your status on Wikipedia when reviewing edits, as this violates civility guidelines. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 14:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful?[edit]

Was my reply here helpful? I put quite a bit of effort into it. Did I write anything extremely unpopular? Best wishes, SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just looked at your response, and I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write me back in such detail. You provided lots of meaningful information, which I will surely use when designing my curriculum. Thanks,NeuropolTalk 15:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]