User talk:MrRhythm

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, MrRhythm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from PopMart Tour. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to the GDP rankings in the UK article[edit]

You have three times now changed the changed the ranking of the GDP of the UK in the infobox without providing a reliable source for the change, and also without also changing the corresponding information in the lead paragraph, leading to contradictory information. You have also not been providing an edit summary for your changes; while not required, this is a courtesy that makes it easier for other editors to understand the reason for your changes.

Please come to the article discussion page to talk about the changes to the rankings. Thank you, NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 15:50, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have again changed information in the United Kingdom article that introduces conflicts within the article and across the encyclopedia, as explained on the article discussion page. I have again reverted you. Before you change the information again, please come to the discussion page and help us form consensus. Thank you. NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 14:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution notification[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "United Kingdom". Thank you. --NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 15:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you see, the case at the dispute resolution noticeboard was closed with the observation that the issue isn't about content, but about your conduct: specifically, your unwillingness to discuss your changes. The observer suggests that, if you again insert your unsourced material into the United Kingdom article without first discussing the issue on the article talk page and addressing the concerns that I and User:Rangoon11 have raised there about your additions, to raise the issue of your conduct at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard. I would prefer not to do that, and I will not, if you go to the UK article talk page discussion I started above and help us resolve the issue there, instead of simply re-inserting your additions without comment. NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 18:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 01:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The way things are done at Wikipedia is by collegial debate and consensus. Repeatedly re-inserting the same material against opposition is edit warring and can lead to you being blocked if you do not desist. Take a look at WP:BRD, what you should be doing now is discussing with other editors. Please do not revert again without first discussing. You should take this as a final warning not to edit war. Spinning Spark 11:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220.101.30 talk^\edits(aka 220.101) - 08:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username In actu. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mi Delirio World Tour with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! In actu (Guerillero) | My Talk 00:49, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited São Bernardo do Campo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Porto Alegre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]