User talk:Mr-MohammedAzeez

Welcome![edit]

Hi, محمد يحيي خوشناو, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

For a translation of the above message, please click the link below that matches your primary language.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. Eye snore 23:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speda Tv (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gorden 2211 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not show notability, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] is an example of WP:REFBOMB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speda Tv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Speda Tv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gorden 2211 (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speda Tv (February 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speda Tv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Speda Tv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 12:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himdad Shahin (February 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alyo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In order to pass our notability guidelines, you need to include multiple reliable sources about Shahin, not just sources in which Shahin is quoted. He also does not appear to be an elected official, so the guidelines about politicians (WP:NPOL) do not apply to him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Himdad Shahin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Himdad Shahin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alyo (chat·edits) 08:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, محمد يحيي خوشناو! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alyo (chat·edits) 08:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speda Tv (March 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

NO improvement was made since last decline. Simply resubmitted. Please address the comments left by previous reviewers prior to resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speda Tv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Speda Tv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wrote an article for Speda TV, But this article does not appear in Google search. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of male professional bodybuilders. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Himdad Shahin[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Himdad Shahin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Speda Tv[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Speda Tv, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himdad Shahin (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Himdad Shahin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what is your rush?[edit]

Hi. You seem to be wasting Wikipedia's time trying to push non-notable Kurdish subjects. You have not declared your conflict of interest so assuming these are things you are interested in, I ask that you more carefully read WP:N. I also ask that you patently wait for your drafts to be reviewed rather than hassle Wikipedians to aid in your apparent promotional effort. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is from my sincerity and my good intention to contribute to the development of Wikipedia and to add many prominent Kurdish personalities to the Wikipedia platform, but the problem with the Kurdish language is that most of the articles published by Kurdish news sites do not enter the search engine, so Wikipedia editors and administrators are difficult to access. . Thanks. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 21:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure Kurdish-language websites are crawled by search engines the same as any other websites. Regardless, Wikipedia is not a platform to promote other subjects. This is an encyclopedia and we have rules about notability, sources, and citations. While I understand that these Kurdish subjects are important in your world, Wikipedia's guidance is global. I am, again, asking that despite your frustration, you stop nagging other editors help you accomplish your goals which are not our goals. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speda TV for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speda TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speda TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Chris troutman I have published an article about one of the most important Kurdish channels in Iraq, as it has strong sources talking about this channel and I linked it with the article, as well as it has many internal sources within Wikipedia related to the article:

and mentions the extent of its importance in Iraqi society in particular In the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and a while ago with a group of other editors, we modified and corrected the errors that were present in the article.

Therefore, I ask you not to delete this article because it represents a large media organization in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and I ask you to forgive us for the errors that may be in the article because I am a new member of Wikipedia. Thank you very much. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 21:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr-MohammedAzeez - you need to present your reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speda TV, not here - Arjayay (talk) 22:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Mr-MohammedAzeez, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez,

There is a steep learning curve to editing on Wikipedia and you have undertaken the most difficult task there is....creating a new article that gets accepted into the main space of the project. Most new editors do not succeed at this on their first, second or even third try.

If you have questions about article creation on Wikipedia or any of its guidelines, policies or practices, I encourage you to bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice and support. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 08:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speda TV moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Speda TV, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 02:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nabaz Abdulhamid moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Nabaz Abdulhamid, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Speda Tv[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Speda Tv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speda TV (November 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvements have been made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speda TV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 15:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabaz Abdulhamid (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Personal details (DOB, education) must be clearly referenced with inline citations to reliable published sources, or else removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabaz Abdulhamid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Himdad Shahin[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Himdad Shahin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Mala Fayaq moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Muhammad Mala Fayaq, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speda TV has been accepted[edit]

Speda TV, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 13:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speda TV for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speda TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speda TV (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 14:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nabaz Abdulhamid[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nabaz Abdulhamid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muhammad Mala Fayaq[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muhammad Mala Fayaq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad Mala Fayaq[edit]

Hello, Mr-MohammedAzeez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammad Mala Fayaq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Speda TV[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Speda TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speda TV (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 00:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 14:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told many times that there is consensus against this article. Returning to edit only to promote the channel is not acceptable. Please make all relevant declarations and advise what you'd edit about if unblocked.

(Indefinite because @Mr-MohammedAzeez is only sporadically active and a time limited block doesn't work. Not because I see this necessarily as a long term block if sufficiently addressed) Star Mississippi 14:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i am sorry for that but i was don't know the Wikipedia guidelines, please remove my block.

And this article its important for the channel .

Thank you. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 16:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I told you more than a year ago to stop trying to advertise on Wikipedia. And here you are, telling us that writing about Speda TV is important for your channel. You lie to us that you did not understand that this sort of editing was not permitted and yet admit that you are only here for promotion. For that reason, you will never be unblocked. That article will never be created. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respect yourself, how can an editor use the word “lying” to another user?! Is this acceptable and consistent with Wikipedia rules and guidelines?!!

I have created several articles in Arabic and Kurdish, and an article in English. I am not an expert in the field of Wikipedia. I may not fully know the rules of Wikipedia, but this behavior, your use of it, and the way you speak to me is unfortunately not part of the ethics of Wikipedia editors.

Thanks. Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have no justice in accepting articles and having them approved by you according to your mood. My article Speda TV was approved before and published by one of your officials after review, but it was deleted with weak justifications.

I prove to you that you have no fairness in accepting articles. There are many articles in the same field that do not have sufficient sources and were accepted and published?!!

for example: Zagros TV and Zaro tv and KNN And more.... !!!!!! Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have "officials". Just because the article was accepted at AfC doesn't mean it's guaranteed inclusion, nor does it mean every article was "approved". It was deleted because Speda is not notable and your continued efforts to promote it will not change that. Kurdish, Arabic and English projects have different requirements for notability and your refusal to follow the English guidelines is why you are blocked. My good faith from earlier is rapidly diminishing. Star Mississippi 00:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]