User talk:Mmredblack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Internal conflict in Myanmar, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 22:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note about Arakan Army disambiguators[edit]

The terms used to distinguish between the Arakan Army (Kachin State) and Arakan Army (Kayin State) (i.e. Kachin State and Kayin State) are based on the location of their headquarters (i.e. Laiza, Kachin State and Myaing Gyi Ngu, Kayin State). Even if it meant where they operated, there is no policy that content on these two page have to be exclusive to their operational areas, as long as a relevant connection is noted in a reliable source given. To further clarify, unlike Turkistan Islamic Party and Turkistan Islamic Party in Syria which are about the same organisation fighting in two separate areas, the two Arakan Army articles are completely separate organisations. All the best, CentreLeftRight 21:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted , however , due to beginner mistakes in copyright policies. I regrettably have to revert the article to aviod the violation. i will disscuss in this matter further more as i try to become a better contributor. Mmredblack (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope we can bring that article to consensus together. I unwittedly created undesirable situation to the for former contributors of the page with loose editorial styles and new comer mistakes. However. I would like to rebuild this through disscussion and cooperative editing. Thank you for your time. If you have no further word , we will continue the talk on the related page. As I would like to justify the reversion, and I also would like to disscuss the disambiguation of the organizations. Mmredblack (talk) 04:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]