User talk:Mdaniels5757
|
| This is Mdaniels5757's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
DS awareness
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 25 April 2024[edit]
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A couple cookies for your help, fresh from the counter.[edit]
|
Thanks for helping me with account recovery. It means a lot. Now I can be on Wikipedia at school. (Also, can you soften the IP ban?) SirPineapl0 (talk) 22:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
- @SirPineapl0: You're welcome! No, I can't soften the IP block: first because I'm not an admin, and second because it looks like there was a lot of vandalism from the range of IP addresses you were on. But it doesn't affect logged-in users like you (and anyone who creates or requests an account). Best, — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024[edit]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
SPI[edit]
Why are you performing tasks at SPI that are those of a clerk or patrolling administrator?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 I was trying to help with the backlog by doing actions that I believed were not restricted to clerks and admins: commenting, requesting clerk action, requesting CU if not requested by a filer where I think it could be warranted, providing diffs where none are provided, tagging two very obvious (and already globally locked) reported socks, and (while noting that I am neither a clerk nor an admin) marking things that I believe need no further action as closed (so a clerk can review and archive).
- If any of these are in fact restricted, please let me know which so (1) I can stop and revert my prior actions and (2) (unless tagging, which I did manually, is the only such task) I can suggest edits to User:GeneralNotability/spihelper, which I had configured to not allow me to perform clerk-only actions.
- Best, — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- AFAIK, you are not permitted to change the status of a report to request clerk. You can recommend a move, including pinging someone you think can help. You should not be using the helper script at all. I don't think it's a good idea to suggest such changes to the helper script even if GN were around to implement them. Am I making sense here, Spicy? BTW, I know you're only trying to help out, and I apologize if my question was confrontational.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. And no worries! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not actually sure if there is any guideline preventing non-admins/clerks from changing the status to "clerk request", but I agree that it's generally not a great idea. Same for using the SPIhelper script. If you are interested in helping with these tasks, there is a solution for that... Spicy (talk) 22:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. And no worries! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- AFAIK, you are not permitted to change the status of a report to request clerk. You can recommend a move, including pinging someone you think can help. You should not be using the helper script at all. I don't think it's a good idea to suggest such changes to the helper script even if GN were around to implement them. Am I making sense here, Spicy? BTW, I know you're only trying to help out, and I apologize if my question was confrontational.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)