User talk:MartinPoulter/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 10

A barnstar for you!

The Real Life Barnstar
Thank you, Martin, for doing the great presentation at Worldcon in London. I was nice to meet you there. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 06:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much indeed, Sydney! MartinPoulter (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 8

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
  • Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
  • New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
  • Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)

Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

  • DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
  • Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
  • Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
  • British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
  • Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
  • Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
  • JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

Thanks

For your input today --Fnorman-london (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

NIMR training

Thank you Martin for this training! --Paulaosu (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello

This message is for demonstration purposes :) --Mrjohncummings (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Slightly confused about how to build a conversation here. --Fnorman-london (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

SelfRef Humor.

Indeed, I agree with you regarding improper placement of such notes. Yet, let's go one step further and suggest that such humor should find a place for posting in its own Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William R. Buckley (talk • contribs) 17:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookies!

Hi Martin, thanks very much for the welcome! It was nice to get the virtual cookies. I'm very grateful for your help, and will certainly ask you if I have any problems. Still doing things in a small way at the moment.

SarahPowellLoving (talk) 13:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC) (hope that's right!)

Evil

Hi, can you help with this?Lbertolotti (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

hello from jennifer

hello! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcwchicagowiki (talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Ciao! 163.1.51.190 (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Raffaella from BAV

Hello

Hello! EmmaStanford (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Martin and Emma --Paola Manoni (talk) 15:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Access to Oxford Libraries

Hello Martin, Thank you for your support on this. I've used the Oxford site cold for chasing references, but am a bit frustrated in not being able to get downloads of things like Early English texts. Just now I am hoping to get the text of a very obscure sermon preached at the opening of the organ at Bridgwater Parish Church c 1700!!!! I'm hoping to trace the maker of it. You can see what else I get up to on my WP user page. Kind regards. Apwoolrich (talk) 18:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Improving Bodleian Library to featured quality?

Hi Martin, (belated) congratulations on getting the WiR gig at the Bod! I spent many happy hours there and some of my earliest published writings were based on their archival material - I'm sure you're finding it an engaging and productive environment. Looking at the Wikipedia article on the Bodleian Library, I can see that a lot of improvement work needs to be done. I assume that potential COI considerations may preclude you taking it on yourself (to say nothing of your other commitments) but I'm happy to have a crack at it for old times' sake. As you know, I have a pretty good track record with historical FAs and GAs (the latest has come through just today) - cf. User:Prioryman#Articles I've written - and I have access to plenty of resources at the British Library.

One thing that would definitely need to be addressed is the frankly not very good photographs of the Library on Wikimedia Commons [1]. I'm a pretty competent photographer myself and have some good equipment so I should be able to address this, but while exterior pictures are of course no problem, the Library is, as you know, not very keen on casual visitors taking pictures inside. I wonder if this is something that you might be able to facilitate? I would look to photograph the Upper and Lower Reading Rooms (and some of the paintings in there), the interiors of the Radcliffe Camera and the New Bodleian/Weston Library, and if at all possible the book stacks. Ideally I'd aim to do it shortly after the interiors have closed to readers, when I assume that only the cleaners would be present. I'd be grateful if you could advise whether this might be possible, as good photos would be an essential component for successfully nominating the article as a FA candidate. Prioryman (talk) 22:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Prioryman and thanks for this expression of interest. You are right that I am staying away from articles about the Library itself because of COI and because the focus of my project is to help counter WP's systemic bias. You've probably seen that User:Diliff has done some fantastic work recently: see [2] and the next page, but yes more decent photos would be useful. I will make enquiries about letting you in: feel free to Wikipedia-email me and we'll talk further. You'd be very welcome to visit us. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, saw my name pinged here so I thought I'd say a few words. I had a similar impression of our coverage of the related articles and last year made contact with a senior staff member inside the Bodleian Library who kindly allowed me to take photos of the Divinity Room, Duke Humfrey's Library and Convocation House which, along with the Radcliffe Camera, are the main historic rooms of the Bodleian Library. I thought I'd already added these images to the main Bodleian Library article actually but it seems they didn't filter through, so I'll try to add them in the near future. So while you are right that the article could do with better images and that the Bodleian Library category on Commons doesn't contain many good images, have a look at some of the sub-categories because I have uploaded some high quality interior photos already. One building that I was hoping to photograph but ran out of time with was Radcliffe Camera. As with other sensitive parts of the library, I believe photography is not permitted during regular opening hours of the Radcliffe Camera so I suspect that any photography would need to be done before or after opening and that would also require coordination with an escort (Martin or someone else) and the security guards who would need to open up the building. Incidentally, if you do manage to organise a trip to photograph the Radcliffe Camera, please let me know as I'd like to tag along if you don't mind company! Ðiliff «» (Talk) 18:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Science conference

Thanks for your note - I have today pinged details of the conference to CIPR colleagues on the science comms working group and to the chair/secretary of the STEM members group. I have also asked a colleague with direct STEMPRA contacts to forward my email to them. Hope this helps. Paul W (talk) 14:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Science Conference

Dear Dr Poulter, I was wondering if there are any spare tickets left for tomorrow and/or Thursday? I would like to attend and can pick up the ticket at the venue first thing tomorrow. Let me know. Many thanks Hydra Rain (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Hydra Rain (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Real-Life Barnstar

The Real-Life Barnstar
for organising all those wikimedia event - particularly the science conference this week — Rod talk 20:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


Hi!

Hello! Susan Hutchinson aka EngIslandGirl here. Thank you for a very interesting afternoon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EngIslandGirl (talk • contribs) 15:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello

I've been working on Véronique Gouverneur.--Sesostris 1 (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi: I'm adding to existing stubs about woman biologists--Olingo24 (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Martin! Making slow but steady progress on Winifred Sargent Kastrel (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, --Natalia Manzano (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

My apologies - I failed to sign my earlier message.

--EngIslandGirl (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Martin

I am writing a page about Jane Wernick a structural engineer who got a CBE this year.--Acgriff9 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Martin, hsm12345 wrote a short article on Elizabeth Blackwell (botanist) during Oxford ITServices workshop.--Hsm12345 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)--Hsm12345 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Martin

As per our conversation today, it would be great if you could take a look at the Malaria Atlas Project Wiki page and come back with suggestions on how to improve!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria_Atlas_Project

Thank you!

From Rebecca Jones - rebecca.jones@zoo.ox.ac.uk

Message Ada Lovelace day

Do you really want another message? --Ylvaprytz (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Martin on Ada Lovelace Day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgratgratgra (talk • contribs) 15:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright

I see that at Talk:Véronique Gouverneur you wrote "I've removed a bot's copyright tag: the body text of the article is original: the matched text is the list of awards which is a factual list which can't be presented another way."

  1. How carefully did you compare the two versions before concluding that "the body text of the article is original"? In the first sentence I see "Véronique Gouverneur earned a PhD in Chemistry at the Université Catholique de Louvain (Belgium) under the supervision of Prof. Léon Ghosez", as compared with "Véronique Gouverneur secured a PhD in chemistry at the Université Catholique de Louvain (LLN, Belgium), under the supervision of Prof. L.Ghosez", in which I have boldened the differences between the two versions. Likewise the second sentence is identical save for two changes: "she took up a postdoctoral position" as opposed to "she moved to a postdoctoral position" and reversing the order of the two expressions "at the Scripps Research Institute (California, USA)" and "with Prof. Richard Lerner". And so it goes on; indeed, some of the later sentences are copied verbatim, without any change whatever. The body of the article's text was certainly not original: it was excerpted from the given source, with very minimal close paraphrasing; even the bot, which relies on finding exact matches, in its report listed a large number of correspondences from the body of the text, not the list of awards, and any human observer, who can intelligently recognise resemblances where matches are inexact, should be able to see the unmistakable relationship between the two at a glance. The copyright infringement is perfectly clear beyond all doubt.
  2. Assuming that you think an article should have a complete list of awards, why can't it be "presented another way"? That is far from obvious to me. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Clearly I was far too cursory. Thanks JamesBWatson for the comment. I'll work with the authors to redevelop the article from scratch. I think there's a reasonable disagreement here about the awards list, but it's moot in light of the other copyright violations. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for the cookies--Lyn Roberts 1 (talk) 15:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Ping

Hi. My pings don't seem to be working in this conversation. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 01:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Finkbeiner Test

Hi Martin, thanks for your message! I didn't know anything about the Finkbeiner Test either, which is really why I picked it. It was fun to research and edit the page - in fact I really enjoyed both the editing/improving sessions I came to. I just need more time for editing now! Thanks for all your help. SarahPowellLoving (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Diana Astry

I'm very happy that you have worked on this and made it real. I had seen an earlier revised draft, sent to me too in an email, but I couldn't find time to do the necessary work. Andrew Dalby 09:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Andrew. Pleased to make your wiki-acquaintance. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Message

Testing communications with Martin Poulter.--Collegehistory (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

hello

This session is actually really interesting!--Jeniver auteur (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Martin.

Thank you for introducing us to Wiki editing. I am looking forward to editing an article!

--AntHarLang (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

WW1 session

It is NOT awful!--Ylvaprytz (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Signature in this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStephenbarker (talk • contribs) 15:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Madeleine Shaw Lefevre

Hello Martin

I see that there is now an article on Madeleine Shaw Lefevre linked to the Somerville College page so thank you for that (if I have read the editing notes correctly!) and for the very helpful course last Tuesday.

Best wishes

Collegehistory (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for participating

Logo of Women in Red
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!

Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 11:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Tudor Music Editathon

Hi there, I'm the main author of the Drexel 4180—4185 article (although the article Drexel 4257 has received GA status) and would be happy to participate remotely (I'm in New York). So much of music history is focused on composers; may I also suggest some of the manuscripts mentioned in these articles--particularly anything at the Bodleian--should receive a good amount of attention. All the best - kosboot (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

@Kosboot: Hello from one library-based Wikipedian to another. Glad to make your wiki-acquaintance. You're doing excellent work. I welcome the suggestion of using the Drexel articles as a source of manuscripts to write additional articles about. Feel free to edit in any suggestions to the project page for the event. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holidays...

Season's Greetings
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Shepherds (Poussin) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
@Johnbod: Belated thanks for this: a new Wikipedia article is the best, most lasting kind of Christmas card. All the best for 2016- may all your edits stay unreverted! MartinPoulter (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

educating academics

I am in your training session. I am a lecturer in English at Loughborough University. I wish my whole department could be at this event, as there is clearly much to be gained from engaging seriously with Wikipedia. Clare Hutton

I'm attempting to keep up without too many headaches. --Spangletangle (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm in your session, wondering how to find versions of a topic page I'd like to edit in other languages?DWAttar (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

hi

Hi Martin --Pipy2 (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi --Lindsay90 (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

hi --Hopesay (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Second set of greetings

Maybe this message will get through from the front row

--BushSM (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

trying again

… from Clare Hutton. This time I am hoping to sign the hallo. LU1916 (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Testing Testing 123

Worth celebrating a room full of new Wikipedia users today? Guernsey cow (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Wikipedia! --Gusall94 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia editing at the oii

Hello from Steve --Sjbsjbsjbsjb (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Children's literature

This is my specialist area. I'm in you session (back row) and learning lots.DWAttar (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks for writing back Martin. It was a really useful session. I intend to tidy up the editing I've started on and also compare English/French versions of entries on the same author.DWAttar (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Interesting session

Hi

I am in your session.--Zametiaw (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi

I'm in your teaching session. --Amelie TGHN (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi

I'm in your session!

Adi :)

--Adipoos (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

bonjour Martin

hello I am in your session pat --PatsyOx (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Open Knowledge

Hi, I'm in your session. Callum — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSM87 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Martin - Delayed messaging

Hello see you in a few minutes or so.

Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Research Information Officer (talk • contribs) 12:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

hello

Sorry I was late--Georgehaggett (talk) 14:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I am taking part in your Tudor Music edit-a-thon. --KatherineButler (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

HI!

Really enjoying the session so far.

--JamesO2015 (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)James

I'm part of the Friday training session --Stellamargaret (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Thomas Causton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Thomas Causton, MartinPoulter!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good - just added a few extra citations from Google Books. Hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

@Blythwood: Thanks a lot, much appreciated! MartinPoulter (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Osbert Parsley

Hello Martin,

I tried to add a photo of Osbert Parsley's memorial in Norwich Cathedral, but I can't do it. It is now in Wiki Commons as "Osbert Parsley memorial", with my own name erroneously attached. It's actually © Copyright J.Hannan-Briggs and licensed for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence, at http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3876147. Could you help me to put it right, please?

Thanks for your help. Poppy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunlace (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Martin! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunlace (talk • contribs) 16:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania results

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Declinism link to Cognitive bias

With regards to [3], I can understand why we would not want to link to a poorly sourced article from a nice one. I don't see any harm in linking to a nicer one from one claimed to be lousy. What's the harm? ~Kvng (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kvng: See Talk:List_of_cognitive_biases#Declinism- your message came through while I was writing that. What's at stake is whether declinism is claimed in scholarly literature to be a cognitive bias. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
That's fine and I'll read what you've posted there. But can you explain the harm in including a link in the See also section of Declinism to Cognitive bias. ~Kvng (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
@Kvng: It's nothing to do with the relative quality of the articles, just the lack of adequate sources to make the connection. MartinPoulter (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Peterhouse partbooks

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Forrest-Heyther partbooks

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your great workshop

Thank you and hope we find other ways to collaborate. --JCNiala (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


hello Martin

I hope this is the correct page! Still got a strange check url message in my sandbox, not sure how to get rid of it.

Thanks --Collegehistory (talk) 15:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for your message --Svenjakunze (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Martin Thanks for the tip and the cookies--Ad8243 (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the training session, Martin. It's really useful.Venustsang (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Interesting session.--RonaldRichenburg (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

I am enjoying the session. Thanks! --Tomdle oxford (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
a Year of Science initiative

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

DYK for Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations

On 13 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in his Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations ("Essay on the Customs and Spirit of Nations"), Voltaire attacked prejudices against the Muslim world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 01:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations

I saw this article through the DYKs. Very nice work! An interesting read.--MainlyTwelve (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@MainlyTwelve: Thanks very much! MartinPoulter (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Commentaires sur Corneille

On 22 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Commentaires sur Corneille, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in his proposal for Commentaires sur Corneille, Voltaire described the dramatist Pierre Corneille as the Homer of the French language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Commentaires sur Corneille. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Commentaires sur Corneille), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for The Age of Louis XIV

On 29 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Age of Louis XIV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Voltaire described his history The Age of Louis XIV (Le Siècle de Louis XIV) as less of a history and more like a painting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Age of Louis XIV. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Age of Louis XIV), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #211

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

This Month in Education: [June 2016]



If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

We hope you enjoy the newest issue of the Education Newsletter.--Sailesh Patnaik (Distribution leader) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #212

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Wikidata weekly summary #213

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Making contact

Hello Martin. Enjoying the session today.--Geographer100 (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

How do

This is Glyn, in the training session...--Glynjamyn (talk) 11:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello

Just saying hello, Martin.--Olihaslam (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ooo. Now I'm scared. Hopefully I'm talking back and saying thank you for the cookies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivrolfe (talk • contribs) 21:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

  • New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
  • Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
  • New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for cookies

Thanks for the lovely picture and all the support. I'll get this thing nailed. Viv Vivrolfe (talk) 12:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

1st use of this ... Hi !

been a frequant user of wikipedia, tho i must acknowledge , i sometimes frown at the descriptions, but deletions can be assessed by those at higher levels of responsibility than us poor readers! and be put back in, with un-ediatbility protections, i understand , so that's a lot better than what you even get in many 'best' textbooks ... the death of many a publisher...

tee hee hee... good idea! (light-donks) self


thanks for the welcome ... although the would-be's of all this edwin/ward? whatever ... snowdon -ia guff , is occassionally tiresome - would imagine unimaginable moreso for anyone stuck in an embassy... and for what? constitutions-invalid / laws-under (or that would be legal, under, a) invalidate mandates of assignments/whatever of power...

no idea. :P

16:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Vurrath/REW 


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vurrath (talk • contribs) 16:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #214

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Wikidata weekly summary #215

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

WWI directory

Hi there. Apologies for the impersonal nature of this post. I am sending this short note to a number of people who were involved (some still are) with World War I topics, letting them know about a WWI projects directory that I've started (in my userspace for now). Would you be able to look and see if there is anything you might be able to add or advice on what is most useful? If you want any follow ups, please put your name on the talk page. Many thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks so much (regarding my Belief Perseverance draft). For the first time, I'm beginning to understand what the problem is. I'll follow your advice and try to extrapolate it to other things as well. In the meantime, I considerably shortened the article, not because I wanted to, but because I felt it would be easier that way to figure out alone the new style (to me). Thanks again! Brachney Brachney (talk) 01:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MartinPoulter/Archive_3&oldid=1078492062"