User talk:MariaDiniz1

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm TCMemoire. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fifth Harmony without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TCMemoire (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MariaDiniz1, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi MariaDiniz1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, MariaDiniz1. You have new messages at TCMemoire's talk page.
Message added 00:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

– T C Memoire 00:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Union J discography page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 03:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content blanking[edit]

Please discuss major changes to articles on the article talk page prior to blanking large amounts of sourced content. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop blanking sourced content without an explanation. Per WP:BRD; you were bold in making the changes (without an edit summary, unfortunately), your changes were reverted with a clear explanation as to why and a request to discuss your changes on the talk page. Continued unexplained blanking is just disruptive. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 5 Seconds of Summer may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

out in minutes, they´re playing seven shows around UK between February and March of 2014, <ref>{{cite news |title=SugarsCape |url=http://www.sugarscape.com/main-topics/music/989570/5-seconds-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Luke Hemmings with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 22:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for the continued unexplained blanking of large swaths of content. I gave you a clear final warning above that such actions without explanation would lead to a block. You haven't discussed these large scale edits on any talk page, nor have you responded to any concerns raised. Once the block expires it is expected that you edit collaboratively and explain the changes you would like to make to an article prior to blanking thousands of bytes of content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MariaDiniz1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It wasn´t intentional i was trying edit the page because some things were wrong, it will not happen again so please, thank you

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The final warning I gave was on February 6th. Since then you you have inexplicably deleted large amounts of content here, here, here and here. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MariaDiniz1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the first three i did because they needed to be changed, and now are better, the fourth that was today was a completely mistake i´m sorry. But i always just change some things in pages when i know is necessary

Decline reason:

This block appears to be expired. Kuru (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shawn Mendes[edit]

Hi, I come to ask that please do not ever make edits such as this. Discography Shawn Mendes is very short, to have an own section. In the main article is all that information. It is not necessary to create another article to include that information.--McVeigh / talk 22:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

McVeigh This editor has done this kind of before plenty of times before and was blocked for the same reasons. Should this editor be blocked instead? They don't seem to comprehend what their actions in their editing. Callmemirela (talk) 12:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Shawn Mendes. If you do this again, after being reverted twice for the same edit, and you continue after this warning, you will be blocked. You had been blocked once for the same reason. Stop it. Callmemirela (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why u reverted my edit in shawn mendes page when i was adding about his new single and the charts?

User:MariaDiniz1 I reverted your edit because it was unsourced and had too many TBAs. You always have to source your content before a release. You may be new to editing, but you have to understand you have to cite your sources to new content that was introduced. Callmemirela (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shawn Mendes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Callmemirela (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was adding about his past tour and upcoming tour i don´t see any resource in other´s musician pages about that so why this page has to be different..

MariaDiniz1 Shawn is an unknown or semi-famous celebrity. It does not matter what you think, not everyone knows whom he is. You HAVE to follow Wikipedia guidelines. Cite your sources, please.Callmemirela (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fifth Harmony. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IPadPerson (talk) 00:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ShawnsFirstHeadlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottsdale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]