Reuse of File:RMSDeltaSouth.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your inquiry. The picture is a screenshot from the web application at Nederland in false color, where the attribution reads "Deze foto is vrij van rechten, zolang als bron NLR en ESA worden vermeld." (which translates into English as "This photo is free of rights as long as NLR and ESA are mentioned as its source.").

Which is why I uploaded the photo way back when (in 2004, it appears) with a { { CopyrightedFreeUseProvided } } tag mentioning the NLR and ESA credits. It seems that this tag is missing or got lost when the North variant was transferred to WikiCommons.

Anyway, using the current picture on the Dutch wikipedia is no problem, provided you mention NLR and ESA. You can easily create your own particular view though (perhaps the entire delta?) by using the web application mentioned above.

Hope this helps en waarom doe ik dit alles in het Engels? ;-) Cheers -- Curt Woyte (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dank voor de informatie. Ik maak wellicht een nieuwe versie van het hele gebied. Luxil (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

European Seniors' Union moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to European Seniors' Union. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Seniors' Union (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Seniors' Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luxil! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]