User talk:LowKey08

Welcome[edit]

Hello, LowKey08! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Road Wizard (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Evanescence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 13:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Evanescence. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop removing sourced information relevant to the topic at hand. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your edit warring on the page My Dying Bride, you are now breaking the three revert rule. If you persist, you will be banned. ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Evanescence. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Stop removing cited material, and stop edit warring. I will enact a block the next time this is done. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 08:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chucky ice 2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Chucky ice 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Choky_Ice_as_JimmyNichols_for_Playgirl.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Choky_Ice_as_JimmyNichols_for_Playgirl.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Choky Ice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Csoky.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Csoky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Choky Ice2.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Choky Ice2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Choky ice.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Choky ice.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porn actor ((Choky Ice)) Pictorial, September 1999 issue of Playgirl magazine.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Porn actor ((Choky Ice)) Pictorial, September 1999 issue of Playgirl magazine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BUT I did provide substantial evidence!!!!! The same proof of this file that was KEPT and is basically the same type file I'm trying to keep on WIKIPEDIA RoccoPlaygirl.jpg

THIS WARNING IS ABSOLUTlY UNFAIR!!!!!--LowKey08 (talk) 07:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz with this edit. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you, Calabe 1992 02:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Calabe 1992 03:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but this info has been on Wikipedia for several years now, without any problems this person comes along and trolls this article, destroys all my work and you expect me to be calm about it all? PLEASE make him stop!--LowKey08 (talk) 03:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Choky Ice. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Your repeated addition of unreferenced content to the biography of a living person, as well as your insertion of a nonfree image into such a biography, is likely to result in the suspension of your editing privileges if you do not stop. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You (talk) [Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]], this info like I said has been in Wikipedia for several years now, all well sourced, all site are given credit stop trolling, stop vandalizing this article.--LowKey08 (talk) 03:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Choky Ice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You need to stop before you are blocked. You are in conflict with several editors now. Your edits violate Wikipedia policies regarding biographies of living persons and the use of copyrighted material. You need to review the policies I cited in response to your posts on my talk page. Perhaps some of the material at issue can be salvaged and reworked with proper citations, but none of it is suitable for Wikipedia in the form you are insisting on. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The block is first and foremost for inappropriate attitude to collaborative editing. Please re-read past comments about your edits of Choky Ice and do avoid edit warring in the future. There are some obvious flaws in your edits, and your pushing them through has crossed the line. Much information you added is not supported by sources, despite your repeated assurances. The image you're adding violates our limited fair use allowance. The amount of unsourced quotes you're adding conflicts with WP:Quote. There is also much puffery. While its evaluation may be subjective, this must be resolved by talking rather than reverting. Materialscientist (talk) 03:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LowKey08 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This userHullaballoo Wolfowitz vandalized an article I worked for three years now, info that was on wikipedia for said years, it is quite upsetting that all of a sudden a random person comes and trolls and destroys all of the work you put forward. If it was such a big problem why did you people deemed it uncensored in the past? Now I'm blocked for protecting my work and for letting him know that it was well sourced, all link ares given credit.LowKey08 (talk) 04:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

see WP:NOTTHEM. You were edit-warring. Nobody "vandalized" that article. Nobody "came and destroyed" your work. You had messed up that article with very ugly, very stupidly unencyclopedic material, and somebody finally chanced across it and decided to help you and clean it up. Instead of being thankful, you fought against them. You are the disruptive factor in this, not they. Be glad this block is only for a day, and change your attitude when you come back. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What gives you the right to attack me? Calling me stupid is that proper behavior? I don't think so. I was in the wrong I can see that now, but I wouldn't call what they did HELP, they basically DELETED my work, instead of helping me keep my work with some few changes. I have nothing to be thankful, but I see what I did wrong and it won't happen again. --LowKey08 (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Choky Ice for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Choky Ice, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choky Ice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]