User talk:KrutaX

Hello KrutaX. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KrutaX. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KrutaX|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 09:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Serial Number 54129. I read the guidelines you have mentioned above. However i am new on Wikipedia, but in future i will take care of Wikipedia Guidelines. If you think my activities/edits on Wikipedia belongs to a paid editor, you may definitely take action. KrutaX (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Prince (2022 film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Struck out erroneous warning. Adakiko (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adakiko, Please check first what i did. Prince (2022 film) - this title must be deleted under G4. KrutaX (talk) 04:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apology, I thought I was getting ganged up on. The content was c&p moved. What state should it be restored to? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Thank You. KrutaX (talk) 05:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you want to replace the speedy and/or content on Prince (2022 film)? Shall I? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i did but that was worthless. KrutaX (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Somashekhar SP, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you think an article should be removed from Wikipedia, follow the process at Wikipedia:Deletion policy. – Joe (talk) 06:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are not listening and continue to misuse the move-to-draft tool, I have blocked you from editing the draft namespace and Somashekhar SP. – Joe (talk) 06:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KrutaX,

You are not experienced enough to know when an article should be moved to Draft space. You moved an article MULTIPLE TIMES, which should never be done, even after the article was moved back to main space by an administrator/arbitrator. That should have been your first sign that you should stop what you are doing and ask some questions instead of repeating your mistakes over and over again. Now you have a partial block to prevent you from doing draftifications.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, you should consider bringing them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you a second opinion or explanation on why your edits are being reverted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]