Jump to content

User talk:Kmboehm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Kmboehm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Gerhardt[edit]

Hi, I'm trying to get some feedback as to how to improve my citations. Any suggestions? A lot of is this information is hard to find via another source. Thanks.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

talkback from 78.26[edit]

Hello, Kmboehm. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talkback from 78.26[edit]

Hello, Kmboehm. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

citation templates[edit]

Don't let the size of the templates intimidate you. Not every field has to be filled. For many websites there is no "author", so just leave that field blank, if applicable. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Michael Gerhardt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to congratulate you, another editor promoted this, and it most certainly deserved promotion. It is a well-written article. More! More! Bravo! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 23:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]