User talk:Köbra/Archive1

WQA

Unfortunatelly I had no choice but to report your incivil behaviour to one of the admins, and also, to the Wikiquette alerts page. If the problem is not solved quickly, I will have no other choice than to bring the problem to higher instances. --Dzole (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Köbra ^Könverse 16:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Several users already complaint about your conduct. You know that I tolerated you several times, but this time I complained too. Regards. --Revizionist (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

The only ones are you and Dzole, because you don't like your dodgy editing being reverted. FYI, Dzole already reported the same thing you reported and incase you don't remember, you told Future and he only warned me, now you're using the same excuse to get be blocked, leaving the article open for your totally broken English/copyvio contributions. Köbra ^Könverse 13:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

If the English is broken, than improve the English in the article, do not erase the facts. --Revizionist (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I did improve it, heck, I rewrote it, but it doesn't sit with you does it? "Beautiful pictures" eh? What do you find so beautiful about war? Köbra ^Könverse 14:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Only 2 users complained about you? What about this? Why do you erased your talk page? You know you can not do that. --Revizionist (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that's one guy, I already told you about his failed attempt. Where, specifically, does it state I can't erase my talk page? Köbra ^Könverse 14:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Here: Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments and here: Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#When_pages_get_too_long. Regards, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

How ironic, that I answer all of your questions, yet you answer none of mine. Don't bother, I'm going to bed. Köbra ^Könverse 15:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Revizionist: Any user can blank their own talk page - that is allowed, since it is considered their own personal space on Wikipedia. The user-page policy states that a user blanking his/her own talk page is taken as a sign that he/she has read any recent messages/warnings and understands them. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

BTW, clarification on my statement above: WP:BLANKING and the bottom section of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines state that users can freely remove comments from their own talk pages - blanking is considered in the same category as selectively removing comments. There are some exceptions to this rule, and archiving is preferred, but there is no policy in place to disallow editors from managing their own talk pages in this way. However, the guidelines do also forbid users from blanking or removing comments from article talk pages and other people's user talk pages. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Civility

Hi there. I am responding to the Wikiquette alerts that have been filed in the last day or so regarding your behavior. I have not had time to fully research the issue, so I can only go on the diffs that were provided so far. You appear to be in the middle of a content dispute, and things are getting heated on both sides, such that both sides are resorting to sniping at each other with personal attacks. My response is an attempt to get you all to cool down and get back to constructive editing.

Kobra, my advice to you is as follows:

• First off, you are expected to abide by Wikipedia's civility policies at all times, regardless of any current disputes. These are not optional policies. If you are in a content dispute, you are still expected to treat other editors with respect and assume good faith. (Note: If someone is obviously vandalizing an article, it's pretty easy to tell that that person is not acting in good faith. Otherwise, it is best not to infer bad intentions.)
• Second, your conversation with Revizionist above contains statements criticizing his (and another editor's) command of the English language. While it's fine to rework edits to improve the grammar and overall readability of edits, it's not okay to belittle other editors based on their English ability (this violates WP:SKILL). Also, referring to their edits as "bullshit" isn't okay either - you can say you disagree with their edits without resorting to language like that.
• Third, keep in mind that WP:3RR is intended to prevent edit warring, and you can be blocked for making less than four reverts in an article within 24 hours if an admin feels you're edit-warring. If you find yourself needing to revert non-vandalism edits repeatedly, then (a) you need to enlist the help of the community by talking about the contested edits in the article's talk page, (b) you should consider getting a third opinion or filing a request for comment to help gain consensus on the correct content, and (c) you should not "game the system" by skirting the policies. Consider this an official 3RR warning. (I'd also like to clarify that being blocked for 3RR is not a punitive action, but rather one to reduce disruption to the project. A 3RR block does not imply that the admin making a block is "siding with the opposition" - if necessary, both sides will be blocked for the same reason.)

As I said, I have not had time to review the entire issue, so there may be more advice needed on all sides of the dispute. I am simply addressing the most immediately visible concerns regarding the way you're interacting with these other editors. Please tone it down, and sit back and cool off if you need to. Arguments, swearing and personal attacks will not help you resolve the dispute, and may get you blocked for disruption if it continues.

Thank you. Please let me know if you have any questions. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm fine. Thanks for the advice. Köbra ^Könverse 13:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Defamation warning

An important message

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps inadvertently, you may have defamed someone in your contributions. Please recheck your edits. Do not make allegations against someone unless you have provided evidence from a reliable publication, and then make sure you describe the allegations in accordance with our content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Don't rely on hearsay, rumours, or things you believe without evidence to be facts, and don't use sources to create a novel narrative. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all claims. Please see our policy on biographies of living persons. If you may have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things: If the material is still there, remove it immediately. You may wish to use an edit summary like "Removing possible defamation" to prevent it from being reverted. Leave a note on the administrator's noticeboard saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. Do not repeat the claim(s). The revision(s) containing the material can then be deleted from the page history.

coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 20:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

LOL. Because I reverted you? Gimme a break. Köbra ^Könverse 11:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tha Realest, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! JBsupreme (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 15:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chronis 2000 cover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chronis 2000 cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Women's Antifascist Front of Macedonia

I have nominated Women's Antifascist Front of Macedonia, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Antifascist Front of Macedonia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Kosova

Nqofse nuk mundesh mi nenshkru shkrimin tende te lutna mos me shkruje ne faqe. Edhe e dyta nqofse do me shkru dicka edhe ja jep ti titullin "kosovo" atehere hic mes e shkruje se s'jom i interestune. FLM, tung. Ari d'Kosova (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, no comprende. Köbra ^Könverse 15:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Name Kobra = Shqip (Albanian). I said:

"If you can't sign your name then please do not write in my page. And secondly if you decide to write something in my page with the title (header) "ksoovo" then don't write me at all because I'm not interested. Thank you, bye."

PS: Your albanian on my page does NOT make any sense. Ari d'Kosova (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

ნგ cროwნედ ჩამფიონს fორ ა თwელfთჰ თიმე, fალლინგ ჯუსt!!! BalkanFever 15:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

ნდ Qუათერმასს ანდ ჰის ასსოcიათეს მუს ;) Köbra ^Könverse 15:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

So what do you think BF? Does goat milk contain more nutrition than that of regular (cow) milk? I say it does. Köbra ^Könverse 15:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, probably best to ask Kosovo2008. BalkanFever 15:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)