User talk:Justiceisaboutthetruth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Daniel Case (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justiceisaboutthetruth (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet. My InnocenceMatters username was blocked for promoting a business (which I was not doing), so I followed the instructions and created a new user name Justiceisaboutthetruth and that was blocked for being a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

This is patently false. The prior account was blocked after this edit: [1] for promoting the website Freetroydavis. The first edit under this account was the same edit: [2] It is patently clear that your only intent to edit is to push your website, which is what a conflict of interest is. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justiceisaboutthetruth (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Posting the website was to provide info not promote a business - I am new to Wiki and at the time did not realize this would be viewed as a violation. I will not post website.

Decline reason:

The block notice for your previous account explained why it was blocked, yet your first edit under the new account was to do the same....and you claim you didn't know it was a violation? Unblock declined. GbT/c 18:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.