User talk:Jtong95
| This user is a student editor in New_York_University/Research_Process_and_Methodology_-_RPM_SP_2_2018_(Spring_2,_2018) . |
Welcome Jtong95!
I'm FULBERT, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Wikipedia Extra Credit Week 1 Assignment (03/25 - 03/31) - Jtong95[edit]
Hi, this is Tong from MACY program in database concentration, very glad to take this course and gain systematic research method training. I am interested in both positivism and pragmatism, hoping to apply these worldviews in my future research.
Best, Tong JiangJtong95 (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Article evaluation[edit]
Here is an evaluation of the article about Crisis_communication.
1.Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
The major content of this article is relevant to the topic of “Crisis Communication”, but there might be a conceptual confusion between “Crisis Management” and “Crisis Communication”. When editors mentioned concepts of the “Crisis Management”, they should also clarify relations between crisis communication and crisis management. Questions like how crisis communication works in 3 crisis management phases need to be further explained. It can be assumed that different crisis management phases have different crisis communication strategies. The latter “Crisis Respond Strategy” can be discussed under a framework of crisis management. This will organize scattering parts of this article in an integrated way.
2.Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
General stance of this article is neutral. The “Crisis Communication Dilemma” item makes an objective supplementary comment on the crisis communication from a legal point of view.
3.Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented?
The theoretic basis mentioned here is limited. Under the “Crisis Communication Literature” item, theories like image repair theory and stakeholder theory were introduced to explore causal factors, stakeholders’ reaction and institutional responses. Cultural political dimensions and moral controversy issues are ignored. They should be discussed independently, which broadens the theoretical scope of this topic.
4.Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Previous research rarely discussed moral controversy of the crisis communication. It should be expanded and explained here.Jtong95 (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac16888 Talk 15:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)