User talk:JenniferTheEmpress0

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JenniferTheEmpress0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines[edit]

It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself. Personal websites are generally not allowed in external links.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments.
Assume good faith as much as reasonably possible, and then about half-way past the border for unreasonable possibility. Wikipedia is edited entirely by volunteers, and there are more articles than active editors. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User: Darkness Shines and User:Ian.thomson, thanks for the advice. I took sufficient time to read and comprehend all of those guidance. I greatly appreciate it. --JenniferTheEmpress0 (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cam edit[edit]

Hi JenniferTheEmpress0, i've reverted your last edit to Cam since the grammar error you correctly picked was due to previous vandalization by 170.158.217.52, i've restored original sentence, hope you agree with it :)

ProprioMe OW (talk) 15:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:ProprioMe OW, it'd be alright! --JenniferTheEmpress0 (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]