User talk:Jebcubed/Archives/2019/December

Two points on Mike Berlon

Please be advised that:

1. Boardwalknw8 opened a WP:ANI thread about your reverts at Mike Berlon.
2. I have replied in that thread. In my opinion as an admin, your reverts to this point were bona fide reverts of what you perceived as gross spam/vandalism. However, I think this is more of a content dispute issue, so any further reverts would fall under the 3RR restrictions.

Feel free to contact me if you have something further you'd like me to consider on this matter. —C.Fred (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Boardwalknw8 Jebcubed: Good advice from (Fred C.) Am more than willing to discuss any content dispute that you have concerning the page Mike Berlon. If you will let me know what you perceive to be at issue we will hopefully be able to reach a consensus. Please identify what you believe is not factual and let me know your suggested changes. Thanks. Boardwalknw8 18:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jeb

I was trying to make the National Centre for Computing Education page factually accurate and take out some irrelevant bits. Can you please tell me which bits you believe are marketing?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by STEM Communications (talk • contribs) 16:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

STEM Communications, this bit, for one. "aiming to create an inspirational world-class education in computing for every child". That's blatantly promotional. I suggest you read over WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP. Jeb³_{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 16:17, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Sinebot sandbox

Hello Jeb, I was trying out the Sinebot sandbox and I received a message from you, which asked me to use another sandbox. Is the sinebot sandbox not a sandbox??

Thanks 2A00:23C4:9297:DE01:124:D944:4201:47C9 (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)