User talk:James Harland

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 00:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Mens Room[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Mens Room requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 00:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia" --Orange Mike | Talk 00:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to KISW. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stop. Before you revert my edit again, please take time to read WP:NOT to see why it is not allowed. If you readd it, I will have no choice to report you. Emarsee ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 01:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate content[edit]

Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue for a program listing of a television or radio station, network, etc. Persistent re-insertion of inappropriate content constitutes disruptive editing; I'm not sure I'd use the term "vandalism" here. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So would it have been acceptable to list the current on air shows and hosts if I did not include the times they were on the air? James_Harland 08:54, 2 December 2008