User talk:JFHJr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Fugabus[edit]

I would wish to be your menee and you be my mentor. I'm impressed by your ability to resolve the dispute that no editor has been able to resolve for a while now on Simon Ekpa.

Please, I will be more happy if you accept my request. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and thank you. I'm glad that I could contribute to forming a WP:CONSENSUS that you felt comfortable joining. I am open to responding to any questions you bring to me here (until I'm not). I will respond as my free time allows. You should keep noticeboards like WP:BLPN and WP:RSN as lines of second resort, after a good try for consensus on a talkpage. I am not interested in being anyone's mentor, but I'm happy to be a resource for you if I can be. My solicited advice for you today is: try to piss less people off; try pausing and tracking the general consensus. Also, this ("you can stop asserting") and that (all) might be construed as uncivil, so talk about the topic, content, and sourcing instead of other editors. The corresponding editors did not like it. While being bold, aim still for dispassionate. JFHJr () 22:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS. I didn't invent this wheel. I based my edit on GGS' observation from the article history. @Gråbergs Gråa Sång: thank you! JFHJr () 22:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. We'll see if the peace holds. If not, you might get a ping, unless you're there already! Please watchlist if you haven't already. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of related discussions, may give some context:[1][2] I'm not saying they're interesting. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh joy:[3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: I'm learning a lot on the fly here. But one big lesson is it's going to matter what I name my org when I'm ready. It's super convincing to end the registered name with "GIE" but it's important not to stop there, or these things might happen. The lesson in foresight is that I'll need to add "The Tacitly Universally Recognized Democratic People's Autonomous National Transitional Successor to the" before the org name to head off certain problems with reality. The registered org name alone makes it official and verifiable in reliable sources to repeat as facts. On behalf of the hypothetical TURDPANTS Republic of Lahti GIE, I'm excited. It takes a quarter tank of gas to get to Raleigh and back, and the NC Secretary of State corporation filing fee is just $125 for creation, unless I want an LLC. JFHJr () 20:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: Limited Liability Corporation just sounds like the safer route for this org's president, prime minister, emperor, and messiah (it's all just me). JFHJr () 21:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fugabus, cont'd[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I restored the revision you reverted on Biafra but this time, I added multiple RS for fact checking. 1 2. 3.

Can you please allow that to stay?

Best, «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. The sources that you cite either merely repeat the org's name or claims, or else are very sarcastic about Ekpa's claims. You've also inaccurately described edits as "vandalism" and described what you think I "want" in your edit summaries. That's inappropriate. Your POV pushing needs to stop now. JFHJr () 19:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No,this particular source of Southern Examiner went direct to the point and I found it today on the internet. It has been online since February, I think. I apologize for using the word "vandalism". I think I missed it there. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about that source makes it look like a WP:RS to you? JFHJr () 19:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW discussions about sources belong on the article talk page or on a notice board, but not on my talk page. Discussing article content on user talks is eminently ineffective. You should port your proposal there, and expect to observe and follow the consensus that emerges regarding the changes you've made. So far, you have failed at that. Cheers. JFHJr () 19:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.