User talk:Ivanaivanova

Нужна помощь: не получается поставить фото James_Dickey.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dickey) на страницу русской википедии:https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Дикки,_Джеймс Ivanaivanova (talk) 09:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leo Butnaru[edit]

Hello, Ivanaivanova. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Leo Butnaru, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, put links to. Is that enough? also please help, this is the first article in the English version Ivanaivanova (talk) 05:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 01:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantin Kedrov moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Konstantin Kedrov. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia quality standards. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 01:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:YesI'mOnFire Thank you. Can I ask for your help to improve the article? For your participation, delete some information that does not have authoritative links to understand the mentality of the English-speaking project. Ivanaivanova (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:YesI'mOnFire The job is done. Take a look, please, can I put it up for discussion? Ivanaivanova (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง please view the draft of the article. Can I recommend an article for publication? With gratitude Ivanaivanova (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Kedrov (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Citadeol was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Kedrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Citadeol(talk) 09:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Kedrov (October 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikieditor019 were:

The submission does not have the correct grammar or proper English throughout, which is required for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Kedrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ivanaivanova! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Kedrov (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are also grammatical issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Kedrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Kedrov (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need references for every statements and awards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Kedrov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]