User talk:Hugtrain

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Hugtrain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JTP (talk • contribs) 00:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hugtrain/sandbox

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Hugtrain/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Amtrak, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Also, wikipedia can't advise anyone on what they should do as we have to maintain a neutral point of view at all times. Best, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello

IT is me Hugtrain (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hugtrain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not make any of the edits assigned to this IP. The issue may be due to the wifi at this school Hugtrain (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us the IP involved so we can investigate your claim. 331dot (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic Theater Controls

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Electronic Theater Controls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Electronic Theater Controls moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Electronic Theater Controls, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I was so lost and confused when it published as a real article! Hugtrain (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Electronic Theater Controls has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Electronic Theater Controls. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Im sorry for confusing you today. I did not realize an article was already being drafted for the same exact thing. Hugtrain (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hugtrain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I forgot that I connected to my school wifi. I do not have any other accounts. It is because of the little miscreants we politely call "7th graders."
REVISION: I have been made aware of the account Segatari. It appears that we both wanted to write an article about ETC very recently. I know now that this is not about ISPs. My mistake of accidentally publishing an unfinished page this morning (EST) probably doesn't help my case either. However, I can say with full integrity that I have no connection to the account Segatari. I did not realize a draft for an article like this had existed because I am new to the syntax of this website. I do not believe this block is fair to me, and especially Segatari. I can't speak for them, but I can say that I do not own any alternate accounts, nor do I not partake in illegitimate editing. Although, from the looks of Segatari's contribution page, it does not seem that he is doing anything nefarious either.
I understand that this block was placed to prevent the publication of promotional language on Wikipedia. I do NOT have any connection to the company ETC. I will admit that my article sounds somewhat journalistic and promotional, rather than encyclopedic, but this is because I had not finished it. I intended to provide more sources and get more information on this company. I do not have any connection to this company because of the simple fact that I am a 16-year-old student in a rural town in Vermont. This block particularly upsets me because I am in the process of writing a detailed article on another subject.
I would love to contribute to Wikipedia more because I believe in the freedom of knowledge. I would greatly appreciate an unblock on this ban. I will read the manual of style and the article policies before I continue. I will also research and identify any existing articles before making my own to reduce disruption. If you have any questions for me, please feel free to ask. Hugtrain (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Based on the CU evidence, I've unblocked you. I read your explanation about about promotion, and I'll accept it on good faith. Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

The block was not based on your IPs, about which I know nothing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Checkuser note: Hugtrain is very  Unlikely to Segatari; if there was no time gap between contributions, I'd call them entirely  Unrelated. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
• Hugtrain, what concerns me at this point is how much promotion you've engaged in. Not only the article about the company, but also Draft:Source Four, a brand name of the company. I know you say you have no connection to the company, but, given your actions, it is hard to believe.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

  Hi again. I can totally understand why you see this. Reading the article, it feels more like something for a brochure or datasheet than an encyclopedia, but that's why it's still a draft: there's still time to revise it and make it more NPOV. I want to write an article about this fixture because it's a very common light in theaters all over the world. I plan to conduct some thorough research about it.

  My explaination is: I was reading the ERS page and noticed the red links to the Source Four. I read on Wikipedia: Red link that "Create red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would help a reader understand the content of the article in which the red link will appear," so, after checking for an existing page, I assumed that that's what the writer of the ERS article was intending. I decided to start the draft because, as I said, it's a very common fixture. While writing the draft, I also noticed there was no ETC page. This was strange to me because they are also pretty well-known in the theater industry. I looked at the live articles (not drafts which is why I missed the rejected draft) and came across the page for Clay Paky, another reputable company. I decided in my hyperfixation to start a page for ETC in the same manner, talking about their facts, history, and awards. Then later in the day my account is blocked for sock-puppeting. I will admit that there is a suspicious gap in my account that the other's (Segatari's) fills, but I do not own this account. I also think that they are in Germany as the original article is in German, and I am in America. Do you have any other information to suspect me of sock-puppeting? If so, I'd be happy to answer any questions.Hugtrain (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Request Revised

(Moved Above as per guidelines) Hugtrain (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Ping David notMD in reply to teahouse comment

@David notMD: For some reason there is a lot of confusion about who I am. I think 331dot is an administrator. Hugtrain (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)