User talk:Habibz

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of His excellency (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Note that indefinitely banned User:His_excellency has been engaging in a great deal of sockpuppetry lately.

This new user, Habibz, has come forward just as His excellency's last puppet User:MomoShomo was blocked by Tom Harrison. --ProtectWomen 19:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, You know exactly what I'm talking about. I admire your perseverance, but you will be blocked again soon as a sock. --ProtectWomen 19:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning[edit]

Obligatory 3RR warning for Criticism of Islam. You cannot revert more than 4 times in a 24-hour period on the same article, per WP:3RR. That is all. - Merzbow 20:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, I screwed up, you cannot revert more than 3 times. - Merzbow 20:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

24 Hour Block[edit]

You have been blocked for three-revert rule violation at Criticism of Islam for a period of twenty-four hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 21:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habibz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocks cannot be only applied to one side of a dispute. 3 people engaged in edit warring with multiple reverts, only I am blocked? they stated no reason for deleting the material I added.

Decline reason:

Don't edit war, and you won't get blocked. This is simple. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have extended the block to thirty-six hours. This is not just about "three-revert rule", per se. It's quite obvious that you are operating block-evading sockpuppets, and I believe the allegations that you are His excellency. You were reverted by multiple editors and, assuming the accusations are correct, the other parties' reverts would be accepted under the exception reverts to undo actions performed by banned users. -- tariqabjotu 21:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser[edit]

Please make note of the pending case: [1] --ProtectWomen 21:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]