User talk:Grey666

I'm never going to learn wikipedia because anyone can edit this page and every other page and say whatever they want.

The idea of wikipia is awesome, but the truth is that no institution of higher learning is or will ever acknowledge this site.

And neither will I.... I enjoy the information, but everything on this site is 50% true. I don't give a fuck about talk pages or whatever bullshit you got in mind.... this site is 50% bullshit. Period.

The greater and global consciousnous is not a perceivable thing mainly because it is in fact a greater sub-consciousnous and we (none of us) speak the language. We can however apply differences or distractions... our will. My will is very powerful when it is not directed at short term goals... 18 billion rats in China, for example... I hate China and I hate the Chinese, I spent 3 months of my life wishing that the Chinese would be over-run by rats and eventually they were.

It's not just me however... it's the greater sub-consciousnous ... it's our will. All of our will.

Welcome, talk pages, and cheese

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I saw your comments at the "Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines" page. Unfortunately, after all that, you still posted your comments in the "wrong" place. The page you posted on is for discussing the actual "Talk page guidelines" page. Because of that, I've removed them from that page. You can still find them in the page history, (history link).

The discussion tab

I expect you wanted to make comments about a Wikipedia article. Every article on Wikipedia has it's own corresponding talk page. If you're viewing an article, you can click the "discuss" tab to get to the article's talk page (see picture). Then you can edit the talk page like you edit any wiki page. A convenient tip is click the plus sign (+) tab on the talk page to add a new section for a new topic.

Unfortunately, because you posted at the discussion page for the discussion guidelines page itself, it's hard for anyone to tell what article you were referring to. I would guess the cheese article, though. I can't even comprehend what the fuck you are doing here.... I can't edit my own fucking shit.

I am spending all my time willing earth quakes mostly because I hate all of you. Every night - Earthquakes.

Please be advised that Wikipedia has a strict policy on neutrality. Your own personal opinions are generally not acceptable in articles. However, there are ways to introduce factual references to third-party criticism into an article. See the page "Wikipedia:Criticism" for help on that.

I'm also a little concerned with your difficulty in figuring this out. That's a sign that the instructions provided need improvement. Would you be willing to comment on what you were expecting to find when you went looking to post a message?

You can respond to this message by clicking the "Edit this page" tab at the top of this page (your own talk page), and then just adding text after mine. I'll have this page in my watch list, so I'll see any comments you make.

Thanks, and good luck here at Wikipedia!

—DragonHawk (talk|hist) 20:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

No wonder it took you so long to post a comment. You could not have found a more obscure place to put it!!!

I was going to get all bureaucratic and tell you the above as well, but DragonHawk has beaten me to it. Instead, let me say that I agree with you that American cheese is tasteless rubbish. At least in the parts I have visited (LA and NY). The problem seems to have infected Mexico as well. Do you have any actual evidence that it is only 10% cheese? If so, we should write something in the article. I would say there is a case for drastically reducing the American cheese making statistics in the articles table as well if this is true.

Spinningspark (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

No One Home

Can someone e-mail this user with the URL to his own Talk page? I don't think he knows how to get here without guidance.

Spinningspark (talk) 21:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

He may not have learned how to navigate just yet but he speaks the truth about processed cheese. It's crap!Typing Monkey - ^{(type to me)} 04:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gettysburg Address, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Internet, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Internet was changed by Grey666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950314 on 2011-01-29T16:26:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Opinions

Please stop inserting your opinions into the article Internet. If you think something is misrepresented and you cannot compose encyclopedic prose, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Kbrose (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Liggett Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Liggett Group was changed by Grey666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857358 on 2011-09-16T12:47:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)