User talk:FranzSebastianvH

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Troubles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O'Houlihans[edit]

Hi, thank you for your recent edit to the Pre-Norman invasion Irish Celtic kinship groups article. However, the O'Houlihans are not mentioned as being from the Uí Mháine in the source which I have quoted. Therefore please can you add a reference to the article to verify this. Thanks. QuintusPetillius (talk) 20:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Síol Anmchadha. [1] Please read the O'Houlihan (dynasty) page closer. There are a wide range of sources in the article. I will add my source now. FranzSebastianvH (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Arms of the Barons of Monok.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Arms of the Barons of Monok.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax
I'll edit that soon. I am the creator and owner of that photo. FranzSebastianvH (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve O'Houlihan (dynasty)[edit]

Hello, FranzSebastianvH,

Thank you for creating O'Houlihan (dynasty).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

please don't cite genealogy sites such as Familytreedna

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Andrevan}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Andre🚐 06:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely that when combined and in agreeance with other reliable sources (which they are), it is okay?
Kind Regards, FranzSebastianvH (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{Re|Andrevan}} FranzSebastianvH (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]