User talk:FAdesdae378/Archives/2022/August
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
- From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something
- News and notes: Information considered harmful
- In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap
- Op-Ed: The "recession" affair
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
- Community view: Youth culture and notability
- Opinion: Criminals among us
- Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement
- Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country
- Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us
- Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists
- Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot
- On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
- Essay: How to research an image
- Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed
- Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia
- Gallery: A backstage pass
- From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened
War in Donbass/Donbas
I am not messing around with the redirect for discussion. But fact is that you readded 689 links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 21:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Your statement appears to be misspelled. Please fix it. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 21:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sloppy spelling is true. But what about the facts? The Banner talk 22:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- The RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 4#War in Donbass was closed as keep because it was nominated by a blocked user in violation of their block, and everyone in the discussion supported keeping the redirect. The links to the disambiguation page should be retargeted. Please note that if an RfD is closed as keep, the redirect target should not be changed without further discussion. I closed the discussion per WP:CSK#4: Nominations by blocked or banned users in violation of their block or ban, where all other participants support keeping the page. Please do not relist the redirect, as relisting can be abusive. Please see Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 23:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sloppy spelling is true. But what about the facts? The Banner talk 22:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
We are usually collegial with longtime editors
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is allowed to template any user, templating regulars, especially those with high edit counts, is highly discouraged. Please refrain from doing that, as this might result in loss of editing privileges. Please read Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox and if you have any questions, please ask them at the Help desk or at the teahouse. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Chris Troutman (talk) 23:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
gaining experience
Hey, FAdesdae! I'm going to recommend that you gain quite a bit more experience before you start telling much more experienced editors what you think they're doing wrong. If you go to Preferences>Gadgets and enable Navigation Popups, it will allow you to see how experienced an editor is by hovering over their username. If you see an editor has tens of thousands of edits going back many years, you probably can assume whatever they're doing isn't actually causing problems or someone else with lots of experience is already talking to them about it. Valereee (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)