User talk:EvgeniyGolubev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, EvgeniyGolubev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Abd Hassan (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 19:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mach61, thank you for your advice and I would like to inform you that I am working on gathering all the resources about this writer. It is my first work. Thank you 2601:1C0:5401:F10:2E1:71BD:FA02:D554 (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At Teahouse you mentioned Rejected, but what actually happened was Declined, which in Wikipedia is less severe. David notMD (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
David notMD Hi, thank you for your comment. As I mentioned I am new in this place and it seemed I didn't use the correct word. Thank you for your advice. EvgeniyGolubev (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mohammed Abd Hassan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohammed Abd Hassan. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 18:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Asilvering, thank you for your comment. that was really helpful. EvgeniyGolubev (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Abd Hassan (January 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Abd Hassan (January 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by User4edits was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Going by even the Arabic translations of some website references, the author does not seem notable. The submitter needs to clarify WP:COI, and how a certificate of this author is the submitter's "original work" which they have ignored to answer at TeaHouse.
User4edits (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Abd Hassan (January 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]