User talk:EMT STL

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, EMT STL! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Susan Baker (professor)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Susan Baker (professor).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs a better source than prabook[1]. Please note that insufficiently cited material may be deleted for WP:BLPSOURCES reasons.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide:

Thank you so much, I appreciate the quick review! :)

Apologies for the use of the prabook source, I did not realize and will remove it and try to find something else! I've been using Visual Editor almost exclusively because of the ease and efficiency of its automated referencing, compared to source editing, and have noticed it sometimes strips the reference of the specific page on a website where the information was found - apologies for that here too, I'll be more careful in the future.

EMT STL (talk) 15:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC) @EMT_STL[reply]

No worries -- I got caught by it the first time too. It's not quite obvious that it shouldn't be used, and it does appear to have compiled its base information from what are probably reliable sources -- if only they could be identified. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 00:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas R. Russell[edit]

Hello EMT STL,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thomas R. Russell for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DannyS712 (talk) 00:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm linking messages from DannyS712's talk page to keep record of resolution for Thomas R. Russell (page deleted): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DannyS712#Thomas_R._Russell EMT STL (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC) @EMT_STL:[reply]

Hi @DannyS712, I just saw your message about the speedy deletion tag on the article I created about Thomas R. Russell. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and this is the first time I've received the notice before, having created 11 pages. Apologies for the possible infringement, as that was never my intention! Would it possible to be more specific as to which section or element of the article the software flagged, so I could do a better job editing the information from the secondary source to ensure it has no copyright issues but is still a verifiable statement? Sorry again for the trouble!

Thank you so much

EMT STL (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC) @EMT_STL

@EMT STL: see the report at https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Thomas_R._Russell&url= --DannyS712 (talk) 00:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for linking it, it appears as though the majority of the issues come from listing names of people/programs he created or led during his career, not that full statements or sentences were copied over directly. Is there anything you recommended doing - like linking to other verifiable references, or taking out mention of those things entirely? Not really sure what to do in this situation, as that article was a hive of information! - thank you again for the help :) EMT STL (talk) 01:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC) @EMT_STL

I would try to just phrase things differently - after reading through the source, and without looking at it, then try to write the section for the article. Of course, confirm that the source backs up what you wrote, but don't looking at the sources while you write, or you'll tend to use similar language. --DannyS712 (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help! Will do so EMT STL (talk) 01:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC) @EMT_STL

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety has been accepted[edit]

Global Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Otr500 (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of University Innovation Fellows Program[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on University Innovation Fellows Program, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 12:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Global (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

It looks like we may be interested in similar topics. Feel free to give me a shout anytime. Whispyhistory (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Whispyhistory, thanks for reaching out! Yes, just checked out your awesome user page - I noted our similar interests too, most notably with the RCSI presidents list - I have Kenneth Mealy (current RCSI president) and John Hyland (immediate past) on my mental list of pages I'm hoping to make soon.. Will definitely reach out once I begin the stubs for those - all the best! EMT STL (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent..I have enjoyed RCSI...will edit them with you and then we can dyk them. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy[edit]

The article Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable relatively new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Thanks for creating EFAR System Model.

User:Cwmhiraeth while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

An interesting and useful article

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited André Balazs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preparatory school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating physician-scientist BLPs[edit]

Hi EMT STL, I noticed your are part of WikiProject Medicine and have an interest in creating BLPs. I have a COI with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and its faculties, but have an interest to improve some of the physician-scientist biographies that work for the organization. Here are a few exapmles of articles I'm proposing for improvement or creation.

Philip Kantoff
Scott W. Lowe
Michel Sadelain(still adding references)

What is your level of interest to collaborate on a project like this?--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sudha Jayaraman[edit]

Hello, EMT STL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sudha Jayaraman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sudha Jayaraman[edit]

Hello, EMT STL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sudha Jayaraman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list[edit]

Hi EMT_STL! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anshul Tewari for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anshul Tewari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anshul Tewari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 07:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]