User talk:EArvaWeb

Welcome![edit]

Hello, EArvaWeb, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:EArvaWeb, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:EArvaWeb[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:EArvaWeb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

—————————————————

My apologies for the error in creating my UserPage. I have changed my Userpage to adhere to the guidelines and appreciate your help.

EArvaWeb (talk) 18:59, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wgolf (talk)

Hi Wgolf! Have I brought my UserPage into adherence? Wondering if I am still in line for deletion or if we could remove or move this section? I'm a total newbie so I appreciate your help!

Best, EArvaWeb (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, EArvaWeb

Thank you for creating A Calculated Risk (novel).

User:TheLongTone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The synopsis reads like a blurb rather than a synopsis; in my experience blurbs have a very sketchy relationship to the book they puff and many seem to have been written by somebody who has not read the book in question.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, {{Re|TheLongTone}} / TheLongTone

(Quick question - - which way (of the two above) should I post your name to alert you?)

Thank you for your comment, and I'm sorry it's taken me so long to reply! I agree that it read too much like a blurb. I should have added more details - is there anything else you'd recommend to improve it? I also happily see that others have made edits to the page to improve it. Any & all help appreciated.

Thanks! EArvaWeb (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Woodward has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Woodward. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi EArvaWeb! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Query regarding submitting article for AfC, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Woodward (artist, b. 1935) has been accepted[edit]

William Woodward (artist, b. 1935), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]